Preview

Russian journal of neurosurgery

Advanced search

Dynamics of focal traumatic parenchymal injuries of brain in acute period of mild traumatic brain injury

Abstract

Objective. To analyze the variation of clinical features and computer-tomographic dynamics of focal traumatic parenchymal brain lesions (TPBL) in the acute period of mild traumatic brain injury (TBI). Material and method. We observed 78 patients suffered from initially clinically mild TBI (GCS 13-15) and focal parenchymal brain lesions identified by CT at admission. We analyzed the clinical course of the TBI within the first 72 hours after injury in relation to the dynamics of the lesion by CT data. The examination included the repeated brain CTs at admission and within the next 3 days. Results. The worsening of patients’ condition with initially, clinically mild TBI occurred in 21 observations (27%), which was associated with the various manifestations of the TPBL progression. The deepest (up to 7 points on GCS) and fastest, within 8-12 hours after admission, fall in the level of consciousness had observed in six patients who suffered from development of delayed intracerebral hematomas. The dissociation between volumetric changes and clinical features of parenchymal lesions was observed in 24 cases (30,8%),. Conclusion. The critical assessment of “early” CTs at brain injuries with a repeated CT control is required. The small traumatic lesions or even invisible damages on primary CTs can progress and achieve the “surgical” level in a few hours with the sharp clinical deterioration.

About the Authors

Leonid Kravetc
ФГБУ «Приволжский Федеральный Медицинский Исследовательский Центр» Минздрава России; Городская клиническая больница № 39
Russian Federation


Pavel Smirnov
Городская клиническая больница № 39
Russian Federation


Alexander Lavrenuk
Городская клиническая больница № 39
Russian Federation


References

1. Корниенко В.Н., Пронин И.Н. Диагностическая нейрорадиология. Т.3. М., 2009. 463 с.

2. Коновалов А. Н., Лихтерман Л. Б., Потапова А.А. Клиническое руководство по черепно-мозговой травме. Т.1. М.: Антидор, 1998. 553 с.

3. Крылов В.В., Талыпов А.В., Пурас Ю.В. Хирургическое лечение тяжелой черепно-мозговой травмы. Нейрохирургия и неврология детского возраста. 2012. № 23. С. 91-104.

4. Лебедев В.В., Крылов В.В., Мартыненко А.В., Халчевский В.М. Клинико-компьютернотомографическая классификация ушибов головного мозга. Нейрохирургия. 2001. № 1. С. 25-36.

5. Потапов А.А., Лихтерман Л.Б., Зельман В.Л., Корниенко В.Н., Кравчук А.Д. Доказательная нейротравматология. М. 2003. 515 с.

6. Bullock M.R., Chesnut R., Ghajar J., Gordon D., Hartl R., Newel D.W. et al. Guidelines for the surgical management of traumatic brain injury. J Neurosurgery; 2006; 3 (58).

7. Bullock R., Golek J., Blake G.: Traumatic intracerebral hematoma - which patients should undergo surgical evacuation? CT scan features and ICP monitoring as a basis for decision making. Surg Neurol; 1989; 32:181-187.

8. Chang E.F., Meeker M., Holland M.C. Acute traumatic intraparenchymal hemorrhage: risk factors for progression in the early post-injury period. Neurosurgery; 2006; 4 (58): 647656.

9. Compagnone C., Murray G., Teasdale G., Maas A., Esposito D., Princi P. et al. The management of patients with intradural post-traumatic brain lesions: a multicenter survey of current approaches to surgical management in 729 patients coordinated be the European Brain Injury Consortium. Neurosurgery; 2005; 6 (57): 1183-1192.

10. Lobato R., Cordobes F., Rivas J., de la Fuente M., Montero A., Barcena A. et al. Outcome from severe head injury related to the type of intracranial lesion. A computerized tomography study. J Neurosurg; 1983; 59: 762-774.

11. Lobato R.D., Rivas J.J., Gomez P.A., Castaœda M., Cadzal J.M., Sarabia R. et al. Head-injured patients who talk and deteriorate into coma. Analysis of 211 cases studied with computerized tomography. J Neurosurg; 1991; 2 (75): 256261.

12. Maas A., Stocchetti N., Bullock R. Moderate and severe traumatic brain injury in adults. Lancet Neurol; 2008; 7(8): 728-41.

13. Maas A., Hukkelhoven C.W., Marshall L.F., Steyerberg E.W. Prediction of outcome in traumatic brain injury with computed tomographic characteristics: a comparison between the computed tomographic classification and combinations of computed tomographic predictors. Neurosurgery; 2005; 6 (57): 1173-82; discussion 1173-82.

14. Maas A., Steyerberg E.W., Butcher I., Dammers R., Lu J., Marmarou A. et al. Prognostic value of computerized tomography scan characteristics in traumatic brain injury: results from the IMPACT study. J Neurotrauma; 2007; 2 (24): 303-314.

15. Osborn A.G. (ed), Blaser S.I., Salzman K.L., Katzman G.L., Provenzale J. Castillo M. et al. Diagnostic imaging: Brain. Salt Lake City: Amirsys; 2004: 1050 pp.


Review

For citations:


Kravetc L., Smirnov P., Lavrenuk A. Dynamics of focal traumatic parenchymal injuries of brain in acute period of mild traumatic brain injury. Russian journal of neurosurgery. 2016;(2):16-23. (In Russ.)

Views: 696


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1683-3295 (Print)
ISSN 2587-7569 (Online)
X