Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring of facial nerve in vestibular schwannoma surgery: experience of the Burnasian Federal Medical Biophysical Center

   Background. Large vestibular schwannomas can not only change the anatomy and structure of the facial nerve in the process of growth, but also encapsulate it over a considerable length. Despite the development of modern neurosurgical techniques and achievements in the field of microscopy, it is often impossible to avoid damage to its integrity during the separation of the facial nerve, which is associated with the development of paresis of the facial muscles in the postoperative period. The use of intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring in surgery for vestibular schwannomas pursues the following tasks: identification of neural structures, timely detection of signs of their damage, and prevention of iatrogenic neurological deficit.

   Aim. To analyze the results of microsurgical removal of vestibular schwannomas using intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring.

   Materials and methods. A series of clinical cases of patients who underwent microsurgical removal of sporadic vestibular schwannomas using suboccipital retrosigmoid transmeatal access under the control of multimodal intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring is presented. Neurological assessment of the facial nerve function was carried out in the early postoperative period and 3 months after surgical treatment using the House–Brackmann scale.

   Results. Postoperative results of surgical treatment were collected in 11 patients. According to the results of the neurological assessment in the early postoperative period, the result was regarded as successful in 5 cases, satisfactory in 3 cases, and poor in 3 cases (grade V on the House–Brackmann scale). The use of direct monopolar stimulation technique made it possible to identify the location and course of the facial nerve with high accuracy in all patients. In 2 cases, the tumor was resected subtotally due to the appearance of neurophysiological predictors of facial nerve dysfunction.

   Conclusion. The use of multimodal neurophysiological monitoring when removing large vestibular schwannomas can make surgical treatment more controllable and thus indirectly affect functional outcomes.

1. Anderson D.E., Leonetti J., Wind J.J. et al. Resection of large vestibular schwannomas: facial nerve preservation in the context of surgical approach and patient-assessed outcome. J Neurosurg 2005;102(4):643–9. DOI: 10.3171/jns.2005.102.4.0643

2. Wiet R.J., Mamikoglu B., Odom L., Hoistad D.L. Long-term results of the first 500 cases of acoustic neuroma surgery. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2001;124(6):645–51. DOI: 10.1177/019459980112400609

3. House J.W., Brackmann D.E. Facial nerve grading system. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1985;93(2):146–7. DOI: 10.1177/019459988509300202

4. Rahman I., Sadiq S.A. Ophthalmic management of facial nerve palsy : a review. Surv Ophthalmol 2007;52(2):121–44. DOI: 10.1016/j.survophthal.2006.12.009

5. Samii M., Gerganov V.M., Samii A. Functional outcome after complete surgical removal of giant vestibular schwannomas. J Neurosurg 2010;112(4):860–7. DOI: 10.3171/2009.7.JNS0989

6. Delgado T.E., Bucheit W.A., Rosenholtz H.R., Chrissian S. Intraoperative monitoring of facial muscle evoked responses obtained by intracranial stimulation of the facial nerve. Neurosurgery 1979;4(5):418–21. DOI: 10.1227/00006123-197905000-00007

7. Moller A.R., Jannetta P.J. Preservation of facial function during removal of acoustic neuromas. Use of monopolar constant-voltage stimulation and EMG. J Neurosurg 1984;61(4):757–60. DOI: 10.3171/jns.1984.61.4.0757

8. Akagami R., Dong C.C.J., Westerberg B.D. Localized transcranial electrical motor evoked potentials for monitoring cranial nerves in cranial base surgery. Neurosurgery 2005;57(1 Suppl):78–85. DOI: 10.1227/01.neu.0000163486.93702.95

9. Morota N., Deletis V., Constantini S. et al. The role of motor evoked potentials during surgery for intramedullary spinal cord tumors. Neurosurgery 1997;41(6):1327–36. DOI: 10.1097/00006123-199712000-00017

10. Kartush J.M., Niparko J.K., Bledsoe S.C. et al. Intraoperative facial nerve monitoring a comparison of stimulating electrodes. Laryngoscope 1985;95(12):1536–40. DOI: 10.1288/00005537-198512000-00015.

11. Schmitt W.R., Daube J.R., Carlson M.L. et al. Use of supramaximal stimulation to predict facial nerve outcomes following vestibular schwannoma microsurgery: results from a decade of experience. J Neurosurg 2013;118(1):206–12. DOI: 10.3171/2012.10.JNS12915.

12. Prass R.L., Luders H. Acoustic (loudspeaker) facial electromyographic monitoring: Part 1. Evoked electromyographic activity during acoustic neuroma resection. Neurosurgery 1986;19(3):392–400. DOI: 10.1097/00006123-198609000-00010

13. Prass R.L., Kinney S.E., Hardy Jr. R.W. et al. Аcoustic (loudspeaker) facial EMG monitoring: II. Use of evoked EMG activity during acoustic neuroma resection. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1987;97(6):541–51. DOI: 10.1177/019459988709700605

14. Prell J., Rachinger J., Scheller C. et al. A Real-time monitoring system for the facial nerve. Neurosurgery 2010;66(6):1064–73. DOI: 10.1227/01.neu.0000369605.79765.3e

15. Matthies C., Raslan F., Schweitzer T. et al. Facial motor evoked potentials in cerebellopontine angle surgery: technique, pitfalls and predictive value. Clin Neurol Neurosurgy 2011;113(10):872–9. DOI: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2011.06.011

16. Lapteva K.N., Sufianov R.A., Ogurtsova A.A. et al. Corticobulbar motor evoked potentials in brainstem and 4^th ventricle surgery (a case report and literature review). Rossiiskii neirokhirurgicheskii zhurnal im. prof. A.L. Polenova = Russian Neurosurgical Journal n. a. Professor A.L. Polenov 2022;14(4):117–21. DOI: 10.56618/20712693_2022_14_4_117

17. Prell J., Strauss C., Plontke S.K. et al. [Intraoperative monitoring of the facial nerve Vestibular schwannoma surgery (In German)]. HNO 2017;65(5):404–12. DOI: 10.1007/s00106-017-0340-1