Endoscopic endonasal approach for craniopharyngiomas in children

Background. The incidence of craniopharyngiomas is up to 15 % of intracranial tumors in children. The endoscopic endonasal approach (EEA) is widely spread nowadays and especially for the craniopharyngiomas removal in adults. Nevertheless, this approach is still not so common in pediatric patients. The endoscopic technique significantly improves the visualization of the structures located around the tumor.

Aim. To determine the possibilities and limitations for the use of EEA in the treatment of pediatric patients with cranio pharyngiomas.

Materials and methods. A total five pediatric patients with craniopharyngiomas were operated via EEA Federal Center of Neurosurgery of Ministry of Health of Russia (Novosibirsk): the age of patients ranged from 4 to 17 years, including 3 boys and 2 girls. All patients at the preoperative stage already had endocrine disorders in one volume or another. Postoperative evaluation of the visual functions showed the improvement in one patient, three patients remained unchanged and one patient developed worthening. In addition, the volume of the sphenoid sinus was studied, the degree of pneumatization of which determines the anatomical accessibility of the tumor.

Results. Our experience of the EEA for the craniopharyngiomas in pediatric patients has shown a positive result regarding to the tumor’s gross‑total removal and no data of the tumor recurrence at the follow‑up. According to our results it can be judged that endonasal endoscopic approach for the craniopharyngiomas in pediatric patients could be a method of choice based on the anatomical accessibility of the tumor and its relationships with the critical neurovascular structures.

Conclusions. Endoscopic endonasal removal of craniopharyngiomas in pediatric patients can be successfully used when the tumor is anatomically accessible. The experience of using EED in surgery for craniopharyngiomas in children has shown positive results, including a high radical removal of the tumor and the absence of relapses during further follow‑up of patients.

1. Neuro-Oncology. The Essentials. Eds.: M. Bernstein, M.S. Berger. New York: Thieme Medical Publishers, 2015. 418 p.

2. Savateev A.N., Trunin Yu.Yu., Mazerkina N.A. Radiotherapy and radiosurgery in treatment of craniopharyngiomas. Zhurnal Voprosy Neirokhirurgii im. N.N. Burdenko = Burdenkoʼs Journal of Neurosurgery 2017;81(3):94–106. (In Russ., In Eng.). DOI: 10.17116/neiro201781394-106

3. Craniopharyngiomas. Eds.: Lithgow K., Hamblin R., Pohl U. et al. Endotext. South Dartmouth (MA): MDText.com, Inc., 2000–2019. PMID: 30888745

4. Rickert C.H., Paulus W. Epidemiology of central nervous system tumors in childhood and adolescence based on the new WHO classification. Childs Nerv Syst 2001;17(9):503–11. DOI: 10.1007/s003810100496

5. Müller H.L. Craniopharyngioma. Endocr Rev 2014;35(3):513–43. DOI: 10.1210/er.2013-1115

6. Shkarubo A.N. Atlas of endoscopic endonasal surgery of the base of the skull and craniovertebral articulation. Moscow: ABV-press, 2020. 272 p. (In Russ.).

7. Graffeo C., Perry A., Link M.J., Daniels D.J. Pediatric craniopharyngiomas: a primer for the skull base surgeon. J Neurol Surg B Skull Base 2018;79(1):65–80. DOI: 10.1055/s-0037-1621738

8. Deopujari C.E., Karmarkar V.S., Shah N. et al. Combined endoscopic approach in the management of suprasellar craniopharyngioma. Childs Nerv Syst 2018;34(5):871–6. DOI: 10.1007/s00381-018-3735-8

9. Merkulov O.A., Popov V.E., Panyakina M.A., Genzhera G.E. Prospects for the use of endoscopic endonasal approaches in the treatment of craniopharyngioma in children. Detskaya khirurgiya = Pediatric Surgery 2012;3:40–2. (In Russ.).

10. Fomichev D.V., Kalinin P.L., Kutin M.A. Extended transsphenoid endoscopic endonasal surgery for suprasellar craniopharyngiomas. Endoskopicheskaya khirurgiya = Endoscopic Surgery 2017;23(1):10–4. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.17116/endoskop201723110-14

11. Peraio S., Chumas P., Nix P. et al. From above or from below? That is the question. Comparison of the supraorbital approach with the endonasal approach. A cadaveric study. Br J Neurosurg 2018;32(5):548–52. DOI: 10.1080/02688697.2018.1480748

12. Quon J.L., Kim L.H., Hwang P.H. et al. Transnasal endoscopic approach for pediatric skull base lesions: a case series. Neurosurg Pediatr 2019;14:1–12. DOI: 10.3171/2019.4.peds18693

13. Stefko S., Snyderman C., Fernandez-Miranda J. et al. Visual outcomes after endoscopic endonasal approach for cranio pharyngioma: the Pittsburgh experience. J Neurol Surg B Skull Base 2016;77(4):326–32. DOI: 10.1055/s-0036-1571333

14. Giovannetti F., Mussa F., Priore P. et al. Endoscopic endonasal skull base surgery in pediatric patients. A single center experience. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2018;46(12):2017–21. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcms.2018.09.013