Trigger electromyography in endoscopic transnasal surgery of skull base tumors

Introduction. The development of minimally invasive technologies in recent decades has expanded the indications for the use of endoscopic transnasal transsphenoidal approaches in surgery of skull base tumors. It became possible to perform surgical interventions aimed at removing tumors of the base of the skull that spread to the area of the passage of cranial nerves (cavernous sinus, clival area, cerebello-pontine angle), which is associated with the risk of damage to certain cranial nerves.

The study objective is to evaluate the effectiveness of trigger electromyography in providing anatomical and functional preservation of cranial nerves during endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal removal of skull base tumors.

Materials and methods. The study is based on statistical analysis and comparison of the results of surgical treatment of two groups of patients with various tumors of the base of the skull: the main group (30 patients with using trigger electromyography to identify cranial nerves intraoperatively) and the control group (43 patients without using this method). The effectiveness and safety of using the method of intraoperative identification of cranial nerves was evaluated based on a comparison of basic characteristics, treatment outcomes, and factors potentially affecting them.

Results. Fifty-seven (57) cranial nerves were identified intraoperatively in the main group. The frequency of radical removal was 1.6 times higher in the main group (70 % vs 44.2 %, p = 0.03). When analyzing the dynamics of the state of motor cranial nerves after surgery in the main and control groups, it was shown that negative dynamics prevailed in the control group — 37.2 % vs 13.3 % (p = 0.03), and positive dynamics prevailed in the main group (37.3 % vs 13.9 %), 2.8 times (p = 0.08).

Conclusion. The obtained data indicate that the use of the intraoperative identification method in endoscopic transnasal surgery of skull base tumors can positively affect the radical removal of tumors and the preservation of cranial nerve function in the postoperative period.

1. Harper C.M. Intraoperative cranial nerve monitoring. Muscle Nerve 2004;29:339-51. DOI: 10.1002/mus.10506.

2. Maurer J., Pelster H., Amedee R.G., Mann W.J. Intraoperative monitoring of motor cranial nerves in skull base surgery. Skull Base 1995;5:169-75. DOI: 10.1055/s-2008-1058931.

3. Luong A., Citardi M.J., Batra P.S. Management of sinonasal malignant neoplasms: defining the role of endoscopy. Am J Rhinol Allergy 2010;24:150-5. DOI: 10.2500/ajra.2010.24.3451.

4. Kim B.J., Kim D.W., Kim S.W. et al. Endoscopic versus traditional craniofacial resection for patients with sinonasal tumors involving the anterior skull base. Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol 2008;1:148. DOI: 10.3342/ceo.2008.1.3.148.

5. Nicolai P., Battaglia P., Bignami M. et al. Endoscopic surgery for malignant tumors of the sinonasal tract and adjacent skull base: a 10-year experience. Am J Rhinol 2008;22:308-16. DOI: 10.2500/ajr.2008.22.3170.

6. Shipchandler T.Z., Batra P.S., Citardi M.J. et al. Outcomes for endoscopic resection of sinonasal squamous cell carcinoma. Laryngoscope 2005;115:1983-7. DOI: 10.1097/01.mlg.0000178330.09881.6b.

7. Hanna E., DeMonte F., Ibrahim S. et al. Endoscopic resection of sinonasal cancers with and without craniotomy. Arch Otolaryngol Neck Surg 2009;135:1219. DOI: 10.1001/archoto.2009.173.

8. Cook S.W., Smith Z., Kelly D.F. Endonasal transsphenoidal removal of tuberculum sellae meningiomas: technical note. Neurosurgery 2004;55:239-46. DOI: 10.1227/01.NEU.0000126952.51782.4D.

9. Gardner P.A., Kassam A.B., Thomas A. et al. Endoscopic endonasal resection of anterior cranial base meningiomas. Neurosurgery 2008;63:36-54. DOI: 10.1227/01.NEU.0000335069.30319.1E.

10. Jho H.D., Ha H.G. Endoscopic endonasal skull base surgery. Part 3. The clivus and posterior fossa. Minim Invasive Neurosurg 2004;47:16-23. DOI: 10.1055/s-2004-818347.

11. Jho H.D., Ha HG. Endoscopic endonasal skull base surgery. Part 1. The midline anterior fossa skull base. Minim Invasive Neurosurg 2004;47:1-8. DOI: 10.1055/s-2003-812538.

12. Jho H.D., Ha H.G. Endoscopic endonasal skull base surgery. Part 2. The cavernous sinus. Minim Invasive Neurosurg 2004;47: 9-15. DOI: 10.1055/s-2004-818346.

13. Mahmoud M., Nader R., Al-Mefty O. Optic canal involvement in tuberculum sellae meningiomas: influence on approach, recurrence, and visual recovery. Oper Neurosurg 2010;67:108-19. DOI: 10.1227/01.NEU.0000383153.75695.24.

14. Shkarubo A.N., Koval K.V., Chernov I.V. et al. Endoscopic endonasal transclival removal of tumors of the clivus and anterior region of the posterior cranial fossa (results of surgical treatment of 140 patients). Chinese Neurosurg J 2018;4:36. DOI: 10.1186/s41016-018-0144-5.

15. Kalinin P.L., Fomichev D.V., Chernov I.V. et al. Endoscopic endonasal removal of pituicytomas and spindle cell oncocytomas. Neyrokhirurgiya = Russian Journal of Neurosurgery 2018;20(1):21-32. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.17650/1683-32952018-20-1-21-32.

16. Fomichev D.V., Kutin M.A., Chernov I.V. et al. Transsphenoidal surgery of suprasellar meningiomas - is there a future for the technique? Zhurnal “Voprosy neyrokhirurgii” im. N.N. Burdenko = Burdenko’s Journal of Neurosurgery 2018;82(5):30-8. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.17116/neiro20188205130.

17. Sharipov O.I., Kutin M.A., Polev G.A., Kalinin P.L. Lateral extended transsphenoidal endoscopic approach through the pterygopalatine fossa in surgery for meningoencephalocele of the lateral sphenoid recess. Zhurnal “Voprosy neyrokhirurgii” im. N.N. Burdenko = Burdenko’s Journal of Neurosurgery 2018;82(5):96-103. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.17116/neiro20188205196.

18. Shkarubo A.N., Koval K.V., Kadashev B.A. et al. Extended endoscopic endonasal posterior (transclival) approach to tumors of the clival region and ventral posterior cranial fossa. Part 3. Analysis of surgical treatment outcomes in 127 patients. Zhurnal “Voprosy neyrokhirurgii” im. N.N. Burdenko = Burdenko’s Journal of Neurosurgery 2018;82(3):15-28. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.17116/neiro201882315.

19. Cavallo L.M., Messina A., Gardner P. et al. Extended endoscopic endonasal approach to the pterygopalatine fossa: anatomical study and clinical considerations. Neurosurg Focus 2005;19:E5.

20. Zhang Q.-H., Wang Z.-L., Guo H.-C. et al. Endoscopic approach to remove intra-extracranial tumors in various skull base regions. Chin Med J (Engl) 2017;130:2933-40. DOI: 10.4103/0366-6999.220306.

21. Raza S.M., Amine M.A., Anand V., Schwartz T.H. Endoscopic endonasal resection of trigeminal schwannomas. Neurosurg Clin N Am 2015;26:473-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.nec.2015.03.010.

22. Konovalov A.N., Kalinin P.L., Shimansky V.N. et al. Experience of surgical management of trigeminal schwannomas that simultaneously spread to the middle and posterior cranial fossae. Zhurnal “Voprosy neyrokhirurgii” im. N.N. Burdenko = Burdenko’s Journal of Neurosurgery 2014;78(5):23-32. (In Russ.).

23. Zoli M., Milanese L., Bonfatti R. et al. Clival chordomas: considerations after 16 years of endoscopic endonasal surgery. J Neurosurg 2018;128:329-38. DOI: 10.3171/2016.11.JNS162082.

24. Yano S., Hide T., Shinojima N. et al. Endoscopic endonasal skull base approach for parasellar lesions: Initial experiences, results, efficacy, and complications. Surg Neurol Int 2014;5:51. DOI: 10.4103/2152-7806.130901.

25. Gui S., Zong X., Wang X. et al. Classification and surgical approaches for transnasal endoscopic skull base chordoma resection: a 6-year experience with 161 cases. Neurosurg Rev 2016;39:321-33. DOI: 10.1007/s10143-015-0696-1.

26. Shin M., Kondo K., Kin T. et al. Endoscopic transnasal interseptal approach for invasive clival tumors: development of an approach method regarding maximal preservation of the nasal anatomy. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 2015;55:336-44. DOI: 10.2176/nmc.oa.2014-0280.

27. Frank G., Sciarretta V., Calbucci F. et al. The endoscopic transnasal transsphenoidal approach for the treatment of tranial base chordomas and chondrosarcomas. Oper Neurosurg 2006;59:ONS-50-ONS-57. DOI: 10.1227/01.NEU.0000219914.17221.55.

28. Stippler M., Gardner P.A., Snyder-man C.H. et al. Endoscopic endonasal approach for clival chordomas. Neurosurgery 2009;64:268-78. DOI: 10.1227/01.NEU.0000338071.01241.E2.

29. Shimony N., Gonen L., Shofty B. et al. Surgical resection of skull-base chordomas: experience in case selection for surgical approach according to anatomical compartments and review of the literature. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2017;159:1835-45. DOI: 10.1007/s00701-016-3032-9.

30. Khattar N., Koutourousiou M., Chabot J.D. et al. Endoscopic endonasal and transcranial surgery for microsurgical resection of ventral foramen magnum meningiomas: a preliminary experience. Oper Neurosurg 2018;14:503-14. DOI: 10.1093/ons/opx160.

31. Beer-Furlan A., Vellutini E.A.S., Balsalobre L., Stamm A.C. Endoscopic endonasal approach to ventral posterior fossa meningiomas. Neurosurg Clin N Am 2015;26:413-26. DOI: 10.1016/j.nec.2015.03.006.

32. Ansari S.F., Terry C., Cohen-Gadol A.A. Surgery for vestibular schwannomas: a systematic review of complications by approach. Neurosurg Focus 2012;33:E14. DOI: 10.3171/2012.6.FOCUS12163.

33. M0ller A.R. Practical aspects of monitoring cranial motor nerves. In: Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring. New York: Springer, 2011. Pp. 235-258. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4419-7436-5_11.

34. M0ller A.R. Neurophysiological monitoring in cranial nerve surgery. Neurosurg Q 1995;5:55-72. DOI: 10.1097/00013414-199503000-00004.

35. Benecke J.E., Calder H.B., Chadwick G. Facial nerve monitoring during acoustic neuroma removal. Laryngoscope 1987;97:697-700. DOI: 10.1288/00005537-198706000-00009.

36. Shchekutyev G.A., Konovalov A.N., Lukyanov V.I. et al. Identification and monitoring of the facial nerve function during removal of tumors of the cerebellar angle. Zhurnal “Voprosy neyrokhirurgii” im. N.N. Burdenko = Burdenko’s Journal of Neurosurgery 1998;(3):19-24. (In Russ.).

37. Cunningham D.L. Mechanisms of the whole brain. Moscow: Izdatelstvo inostrannoy literatury, 1963. Pp. 250-259.

38. Sogomonyan S.A., Shchekutyev G.A., Lukyanov V.I. Monitoring of eye movements during surgical interventions on the brain stem and parastolic structures. Anesteziologiya i reanimatologiya = Anesthesiology and Resuscitation 1996;(2):44-6. (In Russ.).

39. Cherekaev V.A., Shchekutiev G.A., Ogurtsova A.A. et al. Intraoperative identification of oculomotor, trochlear and abducent nerves in surgery of invasive cranioorbital tumors (new technique). Zhurnal “Voprosy neyrokhirurgii” im. N.N. Burdenko = Burdenko’s Journal of Neurosurgery 2010;(3):31-7. (In Russ.).

40. Wanibuchi M., Fukushima T., Zomordi A.R. et al. Trigeminal schwannomas: skull base approaches and operative results in 105 patients. Oper Neurosurg 2012;70:132-44. DOI: 10.1227/NEU.0b013e31822efb21.

41. Goel A., Muzumdar D., Raman C. Trigeminal neuroma: analysis of surgical experience with 73 cases. Neurosurgery 2003;52:783-90. DOI: 10.1227/01.NEU.0000053365.05795.03.

42. Konovalov A.N., Spallone A., Mukhamedjanov D.J. et al. Trigeminal neurinomas. A series of 111 surgical cases from a single institution. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 1996;138:1027-35. DOI: 10.1007/bf01412304.

43. Goel A., Nadkarni T. Basal lateral subtemporal approach for trigeminal neurinomas: report of an experience with 18 cases. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 1999; 141:711-9. DOI: 10.1007/s007010050366.

44. Carrabba G., Dehdashti A.R., Gentili F. Surgery for clival lesions: open resection versus the expanded endoscopic endonasal approach. Neurosurg Focus 2008;25:E7. DOI: 10.3171/FOC.2008.25.12.E7.

45. Samii A., Gerganov V.M., Herold C. et al. Chordomas of the skull base: surgical management and outcome. J Neurosurg 2007;107:319-24. DOI: 10.3171/JNS-07/08/0319.

46. Tamura T., Sato T., Kishida Y. et al. Outcome of clival chordomas after skull base surgeries with mean follow-up of 10 years. Fukushima J Med Sci 2015;61: 131-40. DOI: 10.5387/fms.2015-12.

47. Sekhar L.N., Pranatartiharan R., Chanda A., Wright D.C. Chordomas and chondrosarcomas of the skull base: results and complications of surgical management. Neurosurg Focus 2001;10:E2. DOI: 10.3171/foc.2001.10.3.3.

48. Xiao X., Zhang L., Wu Z. et al. Surgical resection of large and giant petroclival meningiomas via a modified anterior transpetrous approach. Neurosurg Rev 2013;36:587-94. DOI: 10.1007/s10143-013-0484-8.

49. Little K.M., Friedman A.H., Sampson J.H. et al. Surgical management of petroclival meningiomas: defining resection goals based on risk of neurological morbidity and tumor recurrence rates in 137 patients. Neurosurgery 2005;56:546-59. DOI: 10.1227/01.NEU.0000153906.12640.62.

50. Goel A., Desai K., Muzumdar D. Surgery on anterior foramen magnum meningiomas using a conventional posterior suboccipital approach: a report on an experience with 17 cases. Neurosurgery 2001;49:102-7. DOI: 10.1097/00006123200107000-00016.

51. Sekhar L.N., M0ller A.R. Operative management of tumors involving the cavernous sinus. J Neurosurg 1986;64:879-89. DOI: 10.3171/jns.1986.64.6.0879.

52. Sekiya T., Hatayama T., Iwabuchi T., Maeda S. Intraoperative recordings of evoked extraocular muscle activities to monitor ocular motor nerve function. Neurosurgery 1993;32:227-35. DOI: 10.1227/00006123-19930200000012.

53. Schlake H.P., Goldbrunner R., Siebert M. et al. Intra-operative electromyographic monitoring of extra-ocular motor nerves (nn. III, VI) in skull base surgery. Acta Neurochir 2001;143:251-61.

54. Shimansky V.N., Shevchenko K.V., Tanyashin S.V. et al. Postoperative outputs in function of the facial nerve depending on topography of auditory nerve neurinoma. Sibirskoe meditsinskoe obozrenie = Siberian Medical Review 2017;(6):104-9. (In Russ.).

55. Kalinin P.L., Kadashev B.A., Fomichev D.V. et al. Surgical treatment for pituitary adenomas. Zhurnal “Voprosy neyrokhirurgii” im. N.N. Burdenko = Burdenko’s Journal of Neurosurgery 2017;81(1):95-107. (In Russ.).

56. Kalinin P.L., Fomichev D.V., Kutin M.A. et al. Endoscopic endonasal surgery of pituitary adenomas (experience of 1700 operations). Zhurnal “Voprosy neyrokhirurgii” im. N.N. Burdenko = Burdenko’s Journal of Neurosurgery 2012;76(3):26-33. (In Russ.).

57. Kalinin P.L., Kutin M.A., Fomichev D.V. Our experience in mastering modern endoscopic transnasal surgery of chiasmal-sellar pathology. Vestnik nevrologii, psikhiatrii i neyrokhirurgii = Bulletin of Neurology, Psychiatry and Neurosurgery 2017;(12):41-4. (In Russ.).

58. Kalinin P.L., Kutin M.A., Fomichev D.V. Endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery. Moscow: Shiko, 2017. (In Russ.).

59. Kalinin P.L., Sharipov O.I., Kutin M.A. et al. Anatomic features of lateral extended transsphenoidal endoscopic endonasal approach. Endoskopicheskaya khirurgiya = Endoscopic Surgery 2017;23(3):28-31. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.17116/endoskop201723328-31.

60. Kalinin P.L., Kutin M.A., Fomichev D.V. et al. Reconstruction of central skull base defects after the removal of chiasmosellar tumors. Neyrokhirurgiya = Russian Journal of Neurosurgery 2018;20(3): 104-10. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.17650/1683-3295-2018-20-3104-110.

61. Kalinin P.L., Fomichev D.V., Kutin M.A. et al. Endoscopic endonasal anterior extended transsphenoidal approach in craniopharyngioma surgery. Zhurnal “Voprosy neyrokhirurgii” im. N.N. Burdenko = Burdenko’s Journal of Neurosurgery 2013;77(3):13-20. (In Russ.).

62. Cavallo L.M., Messina A., Cappabianca P. et al. Endoscopic endonasal surgery of the midline skull base: anatomical study and clinical considerations. Neurosurg Focus 2005;19:E2.

63. Frank G., Pasquini E. Endoscopic endonasal approaches to the cavernous sinus: surgical approaches. Neurosurgery 2002;50:675-5. DOI: 10.1097/00006123200203000-00059.

64. Schlake H.P., Goldbrunner R.H., Milewski C. et al. Intra-operative electromyographic monitoring of the lower cranial motor nerves (LCN IX-XII) in skull base surgery. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2001;103:72-82. DOI: 10.1016/s0303-8467(01)00115-9.

65. Thirumala P., Lai D., Engh J. et al. Predictive value of somatosensory evoked potential monitoring during resection of intraparenchymal and intraventricular tumors using an endoscopic port. J Clin Neurol 2013;9:244. DOI: 10.3988/jcn.2013.9.4.244.

66. Romstock J., Strauss C., Fahlbusch R. Continuous electromyography monitoring of motor cranial nerves during cerebellopontine angle surgery. J Neurosurg 2000;93: 586-93. DOI: 10.3171/jns.2000.93.4.0586.

67. Thirumala P.D., Kassasm A.B., Habeych M. et al. Somatosensory evoked potential monitoring during endoscopic endonasal approach to skull base surgery: analysis of observed changes. Oper Neurosurg 2011;69:64-76. DOI: 10.1227/NEU.0b013e31821606e4.

68. Thirumala P.D., Kodavatiganti H.S., Habeych M. et al. Value of multimodality monitoring using brainstem auditory evoked potentials and somatosensory evoked potentials in endoscopic endonasal surgery. Neurol Res 2013;35:622-30. DOI: 10.1179/1743132813Y.0000000174.

69. Thirumala P., Mohanraj S., Habeych M. et al. Value of free-run electromyographic monitoring of lower cranial nerves in endoscopic endonasal approach to skull base surgeries. J Neurol Surg Part B Skull Base 2012;73:236-44. DOI: 10.1055/s-0032-1312712.

70. Elangovan C., Singh S.P., Gardner P. et al. Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring during endoscopic endonasal surgery for pediatric skull base tumors. J Neurosurg Pediatr 2016;17:147-55. DOI: 10.3171/2015.7.PEDS14403.

71. Thirumala P., Mohanraj S., Habeych M. et al. Value of free-run electromyographic monitoring of extraocular cranial nerves during expanded endonasal surgery (EES) of the skull base. J Neurol Surg Reports 2013;74:43-50. DOI: 10.1055/s-0033-1346975.

72. San-juan D., Barges-Coll J., Gomez Amador J.L. et al. Intraoperative monitoring of the abducens nerve in extended endonasal endoscopic approach: a pilot study technical report. J Electro-myogr Kinesiol 2014;24:558-64. DOI: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2014.04.001.

73. Gao D., Fei Z., Jiang X. et al. The microsurgical treatment of cranio-orbital tumors assisted by intraoperative electrophysiologic monitoring and neuronavigation. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2012;114: 891-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2012.01.050.

74. Lopez J.R. Neurophysiologic intraoperative monitoring of the oculomotor, trochlear, and abducens nerves. J Clin Neurophysiol 2011;28:543-50. DOI: 10.1097/WNP.0b013e31823da47e.

75. Eisner W., Fiegele T. Neuromonitoring in central skull base surgery. In: Cavernous sinus. Vienna: Springer, 2009. Pp. 89-104. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-211-72138-4_7.

76. M0ller A.R. Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring. Totowa: Humana Press, 2006.

77. Morera V.A., Fernandez-Miranda J.C., Prevedello D.M. et al. “Far-Medial” expanded endonasal approach to the inferior third of the clivus. Oper Neurosurg 2010;66:211-20. DOI: 10.1227/01.NEU.0000369926.01891.5D.

78. Kawaguchi M., Ohnishi H., Sakamoto T. et al. Intraoperative electrophysiologic monitoring of cranial motor nerves in skull base surgery. Surg Neurol 1995;43:177-81. DOI: 10.1016/0090-3019(95)80131-y.

79. Sekiya T., Hatayama T., Iwabuchi T., Maeda S. A ring electrode to record extraocular muscle activities during skull base surgery. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 1992;117:66-9. DOI: 10.1007/bf01400639.