Preview

Russian journal of neurosurgery

Advanced search

Application of spinal cord stimulation in the treatment of persistent pain in failed back surgery syndrome

https://doi.org/10.17650/1683-3295-2018-20-2-43-49

Abstract

The study objective is to demonstrate our experience of the spinal cord stimulation in the treatment of drug-resistant pain in patients with the failed back surgery syndrome (FBSS) and to evaluate its effectiveness and complications.

Materials and methods. Systems for chronic spinal cord stimulation were implanted in 78 patients suffering from FBSS in Federal Neurosurgical Center (Novosibirsk) during 2013–2015. All patients had a drug-resistant neurogenic pain syndrome character and were undergone surgical intervention on the spine. Evaluating of the treatment effectiveness was carried out by visual analogue scale (VAS) and a scale Douleur Neuropathique en 4 Questions (DN4). Catamnesis ranged from 6 to 18 months.

Results. The median preoperative VAS score evaluation was 6.7, at hospital discharge – 3.1, after 6 months – 3.2, after 12 months – 3.5, after 18 months – 3.4. Evaluation on a scale DN4 before surgery was 5.3, at hospital discharge – 2.1, after 6 months – 2.4, after 12 months – 2.5, after 18 months – 2.4. Complications in the form of migration, fracture of the electrodes and development of hemorrhage or inflammation at the site of implantation of the system were observed in 12 (15.3 %) cases and required revision surgery.

Conclusion. Spinal stimulation is an effective and safe method of treatment of pain in FBSS, but it has specific complications associated with implantable systems.

About the Authors

A. В. Dmitriev
Federal Neurosurgical Center (Novosibirsk), Ministry of Health of Russia
Russian Federation
132/1 Nemirovicha-Danchenko St., Novosibirsk 630087


D. A. Rzaev
Federal Neurosurgical Center (Novosibirsk), Ministry of Health of Russia
Russian Federation
132/1 Nemirovicha-Danchenko St., Novosibirsk 630087


N. P. Denisova
Federal Neurosurgical Center (Novosibirsk), Ministry of Health of Russia
Russian Federation
132/1 Nemirovicha-Danchenko St., Novosibirsk 630087


References

1. Boulyubash I.D. Failed back surgery syndrome: psychological aspects of unsatisfactory outcomes of surgical treatment. Khirurgiya pozvonochnika = Spine Surgery 2012;(3):49–56. (In Russ.).

2. Esin R.G., Danilov V.I., Minkina I.Sh., Esin O.R. Failed back syndrome in patients after the surgery for compressive lumbosacral radiculopathy. Zhurnal nevrologii i psikhiatrii im. S.S. Korsakova = S.S. Korsakov Journal of Neurology and Psychiatry 2009;(11):37–41. (In Russ.).

3. Kumar K., Taylor R.S., Jacques L. et al. The effects of spinal cord stimulation in neuropathic pain are sustained: a 24-month follow-up of the prospective randomized controlled multicenter trial of the effectiveness of spinal cord stimulation. Neurosurgery 2008;63(4):762–70. DOI: 10.1227/01.NEU.0000325731.46702.D9. PMID: 18981888.

4. Leveque J.C., Villavicencio A.T., Bulsara K.R. et al. Spinal cord stimulation for failed back surgery syndrome. Neuromodulation 2001;4(1):1–9. DOI: 10.1046/j.1525-1403.2001.00001.x. PMID: 22151565.

5. Isagulyan E.D., Shabalov V.A. Chronic electrical stimulation of the spinal cord in the treatment of failed back surgery syndrome. Khirurgiya pozvonochnika = Spine Surgery 2014;(4):41–8. (In Russ.).

6. Oaklander A.L., North R.B. Failed back surgery syndrome. In: Bonica’s Management of Pain. Ed. by D.J. Loeser, S.H. Butler, C.R. Chapman, D.C. Turk. 3rd edition. Philadelphia, 2001. Pp. 1540–1549.

7. Pavlov S.А., Shpagin М.V., Yastrebov D.N., Stepanov D.А. Complex therapy of rudimentary pain syndrome after discotomy at dorsolumbar level. Meditsinskiy almanah = Medical Almanac 2011;1(14):143–5. (In Russ.).

8. Anderson S.R. A rationale for the treatment algorithm of failed back surgery syndrome. Curr Rev Pain 2000;4(5): 395–406. PMID: 10998748.

9. Pavlenko S.S. Epidemiology of pain. Nevrologicheskiy zhurnal = Neurological Journal 1999;4(1):41–6. (In Russ.).

10. Cameron T. Safety and efficacy of spinal cord stimulation for the treatment of chronic pain: a 20-year literature review. J Neurosurg 2004;100(3 Suppl Spine):254–67. PMID: 15029914.

11. Shealy C.N., Mortimer J.T., Reswick J.B. Electrical inhibition of pain by stimulation of the dorsal columns: preliminary clinical report. Anesth Analg 1967;46(4):489–91. PMID: 4952225.

12. Shabalov V.A., Isagulyan E.D. What to do with “difficult” pain? Electric stimulation of the spinal cord and brain in the treatment of chronic non-oncological pain. Moscow, 2008. 96 p. (In Russ.).

13. Long D.M. Failed back syndrome: etiology, assessment, and treatment. In: Surgical Management of Pain. Ed. by K.J. Burchiel. N.Y., 2002. Pp. 354–364.

14. Javid M.J., Hader E.J. Long-term followup review of patients who underwent laminectomy for lumbar stenosis: a prospective study. J Neurosurg 1998;89(1): l–7. DOI: 10.3171/jns.1998.89.1.0001. PMID: 9647165.

15. North R.B., Kidd D., Shipley J., Taylor R.S. Spinal cord stimulation versus reoperation for failed back surgery syndrome: a cost effectiveness and cost utility analysis based on a randomized, controlled trial. Neurosurgery 2007;61(2):361–8. DOI: 10.1227/01.NEU.0000255522.42579. EA. PMID: 17762749.

16. Meyerson B.A. Neurosurgical approaches to pain treatment. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2001;45(9):1108–13. PMID: 11683661.

17. Kumar K., Malik S., Demeria D. Treatment of chronic pain with spinal cord stimulation versus alternative therapies: cost-effectiveness analysis. Neurosurgery 2002;51(1):106–15. PMID: 12182407.

18. Bell G.K., Kidd D., North R.B. Costeffectiveness analysis of spinal cord stimulation in treatment of failed back surgery syndrome. J Pain Symptom Manage 1997;13(5):286–95. PMID: 9185434.

19. Burchiel K.J., Anderson V.C., Brown F.D. et al. Prospective, multicenter study of spinal cord stimulation for relief of chronic back and extremity pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1996;21(23):2786–94. PMID: 8979327.

20. Turner J.A., Loeser J.D., Bell K.G. Spinal cord stimulation for chronic low back pain: a systematic literature synthesis. Neurosurgery 1995;37(6):1088–95. PMID: 8584149.

21. Melzack R., Wall P.D. Pain mechanisms: a new theory. Science 1965;150(3699):971–9. PMID: 5320816.

22. Campbell J.N., Davis K.D., Meyer R.A. et al. The mechanism by which dorsal column stimulation affects pain: evidence for a new hypothesis. In: 6th World Congress on Pain. Adelaide (Australia), 1990.

23. Lazorthes Y., Verdie J.C., Sol J.C. Spinal cord stimulation for neuropathic pain. In: Handbook of Clinical Neurology. Ed. by F. Cervero, T. Jensen. Vol. 81: Pain. Elesevier, 2006. Pp. 887–899.

24. Kumar K., Toth С., Nath R.K., Laing P. Epidural spinal cord stimulation for treatment of chronic pain – some predictors of success. A 15-year experience. Surg Neurol 1998;50(2): 110–20. PMID: 9701116.

25. Kay A.D., McIntyre M.D., Macrae W.A., Varma T.R. Spinal cord stimulation – a long-term evaluation in patients with chronic pain. Br J Neurosurg 2001;15(4):335–41. PMID: 11599450.

26. Linderoth B., Fedorcsak I., Meyerson B.A. Peripheral vasodilatation after spinal cord stimulation: animal studies of putative effector mechanisms. Neurosurgery 1991;28(2):187–95. PMID: 1671794.

27. Molnar G., Barolat G. Principles of cord activation during spinal cord stimulation. Neuromodulation 2014;17(Suppl 1): 12–21. DOI: 10.1111/ner.12171. PMID: 24974772.

28. Schu S., Slotty P.J., Bara G. et al. A prospective, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study to examine the effectiveness of burst spinal cord stimulation patterns for the treatment of failed back surgery syndrome. Neuromodulation 2014;17(5): 443–50. DOI: 10.1111/ner.12197. PMID: 24945621.

29. Van Buyten J.P., Van Zundert J., Vueghs P., Vanduffel L. Efficacy of spinal cord stimulation: 10 years of experience in a pain centre in Belgium. Eur J Pain 2001;5(3):299–307. DOI: 10.1053/eujp.2001.0249. PMID: 11558985.

30. North R.B., Ewend M.G., Lawton M.T. et al. Failed back surgery syndrome: 5-year follow-up after spinal cord stimulator implantation. Neurosurgery 1991;28(5):692–9. PMID: 1831547.

31. North R.B., Kidd D.H., Farrokhi F., Piantadosi S.A. Spinal cord stimulation versus repeated lumbosacral spine surgery for chronic pain: a randomized, controlled trial. Neurosurgery 2005;56(1):98–106. PMID: 15617591.

32. Quigley D.G., Arnold J., Eldridge P.R. et al. Long-term outcome of spinal cord stimulation and hardware complications. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg 2003; 81(1–4):50–6. DOI: 10.1159/000075104. PMID: 14742964.

33. Simpson E.L., Duenas A., Holmes M.W. et al. Spinal cord stimulation for chronic pain of neuropathic or ischaemic origin: systematic review and economic evaluation. Health Technol Assess 2009;13(17):1–154. DOI: 10.3310/hta13170. PMID: 19331797.

34. Taylor R.S., Ryan J., O’Donnell R. et al. The cost-effectiveness of spinal cord stimulation in the treatment of failed back surgery syndrome. Clin J Pain 2010;26(6):463–9. DOI: 10.1097/AJP.0b013e3181daccec. PMID: 20551721.

35. Ten Vaarwerk I.A., Staal M.J. Spinal cord stimulation in chronic pain syndromes. Spinal Cord 1998;36(10):671–82. PMID: 9800271.

36. Kumar K., Wilson J.R., Taylor R.S., Gupta S. Complications of spinal cord stimulation, suggestions to improve outcome, and financial impact. J Neurosurg Spine 2006;5(3):191–203. DOI: 10.3171/spi.2006.5.3.191. PMID: 16961079.

37. Follett K.A., Boortz-Marx R.L., Drake J.M. et al. Prevention and management of intrathecal drug delivery and spinal cord stimulation system infections. Anesthesiology 2004;100(6):1582–94. PMID: 15166581.

38. Zucco F., Lavano A. Spinal cord stimulation for refractory failed back surgery syndrome patients: a cost-effective treatment in Italy (precise study). In: INS 11th World Congress in Berlin. Neuromodulation: technology transforming chronic illness management. Berlin, 2013.


Review

For citations:


Dmitriev A.В., Rzaev D.A., Denisova N.P. Application of spinal cord stimulation in the treatment of persistent pain in failed back surgery syndrome. Russian journal of neurosurgery. 2018;20(2):43-49. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17650/1683-3295-2018-20-2-43-49

Views: 860


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1683-3295 (Print)
ISSN 2587-7569 (Online)
X