ESTIMATION OF CRANIOSPINAL COMPLIANCE
Abstract
Objective. The clarification of craniocerebral correlation, biomechanical characteristics of craniospinal system (CSS) and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) dynamics has the significant importance for diagnostics and treatment of some pathology of central nervous system accompanied by development of hydrocephalic, hypertensive and dislocation syndromes. The widely used method for estimation of biomechanical characteristics and CSF dynamics reduces to performance of infusive-liquor test (partial infusion of physiological saline into CSF system and measurement of CSF pressure dynamics). This method is traumatic that is why it has limited application.
Material and methods. The biomechanical characteristics of CSS (compliance, PVI-index, resistance to CSF absorption, curves of infusive-liquor test) were studied using widespread method of A. Marmarou. The analysis of 126 infusive-liquor examinations of intracranial pressure (ICP) in 116 patients with hypertensive hydrocephaly of various etiology was conducted.
Results. The correlation which could be formalized was determined between ICP, CSS compliance and range of ICP pulse waves. The pulse wave going into brain during systole can be considered as model of infusive test.
Conclusion. The formula based on correlation which allows using physiological liquor dynamics tests with infusion of 2-5 ml of physiological saline for obtaining the accurate data about CSS biomechanical characteristics was created.
About the Authors
Yu. A. AtiskovRussian Federation
K. A. Samochernykh
Russian Federation
V. A. Khachatryan
Russian Federation
References
1. Atiskov Yu. A., Khachatryan V.A. Minimal invasive technologies evaluation of biomechanical properties of craniospinal system (CCS) and CSF circulation(CSFC). Russian neurosurgical journal. Vol. IV. «Polenov’s reading»: materials of XI sciencepractical conference. 2012. P. 319.(in Russian)
2. Bashkirov M. V., Shakhnovich A.R., Lubnin A.Yu. Intracranial pressure and intracranial hypertension. Russian journal of anesthesiology and intensive care 1999;1: 4—11. (in Russian)
3. Danko P. E., Popov A. G. Higher Mathematics in Exercises and Tasks (Part 2). Moscow, 1967. 205 p. (in Russian)
4. Kommunarov V. V., Baksheeva A. O., Atiskov Yu. A., Samochernykh K. A. Particular qualities of biomechanical properties of the brain in the formation of indications for minimally invasive interventions // Materials of the IV AllRussian Conference on Pediatric Neurosurgery (November 18—20, 2015), St. Petersburg. Saint Petersburg, 2015. P. 58. (in Russian)
5. Kommunarov V. V., Khachatryan V. A., Mirsadykov D. A., Kim A. V. To the problem of selection of parameters “pressure-velocity” of implantable drainage systems for surgical treatment of patients with hydrocephalus. Ukrainian neurosurgery journal 2001;14(2):97—98 (in Russian)
6. Pastor E. Intracranial circulation and intracranial pressure. Questions of Neurosurgery1977;3:57—61. (in Russian)
7. Samochernykh K. A., Ivanov V. P., Kim A. V., Khachatryan V. A. Features of brain biomechanics in reconstructive interventions. Compilation of theses of the VII All-Russian Congress of Neurosurgeons, June 2—6, 2015, Kazan. Kazan, 2015. P. 69—70. (in Russian)
8. Samochernykh K.A., Sebelev K.I., Khachatryan W.A. et al. Features of minimally invasive interventions in occlusive hydrocephalus. Neurosurgery and neurology of childhood 2010;3—4 (25—26):95—105. (in Russian)
9. Khachatryan W. A., Kim A. V., Kim V. G., Gogoryan S. F. Hydrocephalus in tumors of the brain and spinal cord. Saint Petersburg: Desyatka, 2008. P. 255. (in Russian)
10. Khachatryan W.A., Kommunarov V.V., Samochernykh K.A., et al. To the problem of selection “pressure—velocity” of parameters of implantable drainage systems for the treatment of patients with hydrocephalus. Modern minimally invasive technologies (neurosurgery, vertebrology, neurology, neurophysiology): Materials of symposium. Saint Petersburg, 2001. P. 388—390. (in Russian)
11. Khachatryan W., Atiskov Y. Method for continuous evaluation of cerebral compliance during neuromonitoring of intracranial pressure. International conference оf recent advances in neurotraumatology ICRAN2010, St. Petersburg, Russia, june 2010. Saint Petersburg, 2010. P. 17. (in Russian)
12. Method of assessment of cerebral compliance. Patent right RU 2474380 C1 2474380 of 10.02.2013. Authors: Atiskov Yu. A. (RU), Yakovenko I. V. (RU), Khachatryan W. A. (RU), Samochernykh K. A. (RU), Kim A. V. (RU), Borovikova V. N. (RU). (in Russian)]
13. Yau Y.H., Piper I.R., Clutton R.E., Whittle I.R. Experimental evaluation of the Spiegelberg intracranial pressure and intracranial compliance monitor. Technical note. Journal of Neurosurgery 2000; 9(5): Article 1.
14. Marmarou A., Shulman K., La Morgese J. Compartmental analysis of compliance and outflow resistance of the cerebrospinal fluid system. J Neurosurg 1976;43:523—534.
15. Marmarou А., Shulman K., Rosende R.M. A none-linear analysis of cerebrospinal fluid system and intracranial pressure dynamics. J Neurosurg 1978; 8(March): 332—336.
16. Muizelaar J.P., Marmarou A., De Salles A. A. F. Cerebral blood flow and metabolism in severely head injured children. I. Relationship with GCS score, ICP, outcome and PVI. J Neurosurg 1991;75:731—739.
17. Piper I. Intracranial pressure and elastance. In: Reilly P., Bullock R., eds. Head Injury: Pathophysiology and Management of Severe Closed Injury. London: Chapman & Hall Medical, 1997. P. 101—120.
18. Szewczykowski J., Sliwka S., Kunicki A., et al. A fast method of estimating the elastence of the intracranial system. J Neurosurg 1977;47:19—26.
Review
For citations:
Atiskov Yu.A., Samochernykh K.A., Khachatryan V.A. ESTIMATION OF CRANIOSPINAL COMPLIANCE. Russian journal of neurosurgery. 2017;(4):42-49. (In Russ.)