The surgical treatment outcomes in patients suffered from various types of pharmacoresistent epilepsy

Objective: to estimate the surgical treatment outcomes in patients suffered from various types of pharmacoresistant epilepsy. Material and methods: 43 patients suffered from various types of pharmacoresistant epilepsy were examined and treated under condition of neurosurgical department of Scientific Research Institute of Emergency Care n.a. N.V. Sklifosovkiy from 01 Jan 2014 till 31 Dec 2015. Results: the received data of our study confirmed the safety and efficacy of surgery for symptomatic pharmacoresistant epilepsy treatment. The seizure control was achieved in 69,5% of operated patients (follow-up and check point in 12 months). Conclusion: The presented data confirmed the safety and efficacy of surgery for various types of pharmacoresistant epilepsy treatment as well as the necessity of full adequate examination of all patients suffered from pharmacoresistant epilepsy for making the decision concerning the possible surgical treatment.

эпилепсия, хирургия, фокальная кортикальная дисплазия, склероз гиппокампа, epilepsy, surgery, focal cortical dysplasia, hippocampal sclerosis

1. Stepanenko А.YU. i soavt. Khirurgicheskoe lechenie simptomaticheskoj epilepsii // Gusev E.I., Gekht А.В. Epilepsiya: fundamental’nye, klinicheskie i sotsial’nye aspekty. - M. - 2013. - S. 749-759. (in Rus.) (Степаненко А.Ю. и соавт. Хирургическое лечение симптоматической эпилепсии // Гусев Е.И., Гехт А.Б. Эпилепсия: фундаментальные, клинические и социальные аспекты. - М. - 2013. - С. 749-759.)

2. Stepanenko А.YU. Khirurgicheskoe lechenie simptomatiches-koj visochnoj epilepsii. // Nejrokhirurgiya. - 2012. - № 2. - S. 78-84. (in Rus.) (Степаненко А.Ю. Хирургическое лечение симптоматической височной эпилепсии. // Нейрохирургия. - 2012. - № 2. - С. 78-84.)

3. Lebedeva А.V. i soavt. Dinamika kachestva zhizni u patsien-tov s farmakorezistentnoj epilepsiej pri khirurgicheskikh metodakh lecheniya //Glavnyj redaktor. - 2011. - T. 6. - №. 3. - S. 67. (in Rus.) (Лебедева А.В. и соавт. Динамика качества жизни у пациентов с фармакорезистентной эпилепсией при хирургических методах лечения // Главный редактор. - 2011. - Т. 6. - №. 3. - С. 67.)

4. Stepanenko А.YU. Kortikal’nye displazii kak epileptogennye porazheniya. // Nejrokhirurgiya. - 2013. - № 3. - S. 8591. (in Rus.) (Степаненко А.Ю. Кортикальные дисплазии как эпилептогенные поражения. // Нейрохирургия. - 2013. - № 3. - С. 85-91).

5. Gusev E.I. i soavt. Epidemiologiya epilepsii v Rossijskoj Federatsii //Sovremennaya ehpileptologiya: mater. simp. M. - 2011. - S. 77-84. (in Rus.) (Гусев Е.И. и соавт. Эпидемиология эпилепсии в Российской Федерации // Современная эпилептология: матер. симп. М. - 2011. - С. 77-84.) 5

6. Ngugi A.K. et al. Estimation of the burden of active and life time epilepsy: A metaanalytic approach // Epilepsia. - 2010. - Т. 51. - №. 5. - С. 883-890. 6

7. Meinardi H. et al. The treatment gap in epilepsy: the current situation and ways forward // Epilepsia. - 2001. - Т. 42. - №. 1. - С. 136-149.

8. Sander J.W. The epidemiology of epilepsy revisited //Current opinion in neurology. - 2003. - Т. 16. - №. 2. - С. 165170.

9. Scott R.A., Lhatoo S.D., Sander J.W. A.S. The treatment of epilepsy in developing countries: where do we go from here? // Bulletin of the World Health Organization. - 2001. - Т. 79. - №. 4. - С. 344-351.

10. Jallon P. Epilepsy and epileptic disorders, an epidemiological marker? Contribution of descriptive epidemiology //Epileptic disorders. - 2002. - Т. 4. - №. 1. - С. 1-13.

11. Guekht A. et al. The epidemiology of epilepsy in the Russian Federation // Epilepsy research. - 2010. - Т. 92. - №. 2. - С. 209-218.

12. French J.A. et al. Efficacy and tolerability of the new antiepileptic drugs I: Treatment of new onset epilepsy Report of the Therapeutics and Technology Assessment Subcommittee and Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology and the American Epilepsy Society // Neurology. - 2004. - Т. 62. - №. 8. - С. 1252-1260.

13. Neligan A. et al. A survey of adult and pediatric epilepsy surgery in the United Kingdom // Epilepsia. - 2013. - Т. 54. - №. 5. - С. 62-65.

14. Blumcke, I., Thom, M., Aronica, E., et al. The clinico-pathologic spectrum of focal cortical dysplasias: A consensus classification proposed by an ad hoc Task Force of the ILAE Diagnostic Methods Commission. // Epilepsia. - 2011. - Vol. 52. - C. 158-174.

15. Engel Jr J. Outcome with respect to epileptic seizures // Surgical treatment of the epilepsies. - 1993. - С. 609-621.

16. Wiebe S. et al. A randomized, controlled trial of surgery for temporal-lobe epilepsy //New England Journal of Medicine. - 2001. - Т. 345. - №. 5. - С. 311-318.

17. Engel J. et al. Early surgical therapy for drug-resistant temporal lobe epilepsy: a randomized trial // JAMA. - 2012. - Т. 307. - №. 9. - С. 922-930.

18. See S.J. et al. Surgical outcomes in patients with extratemporal epilepsy and subtle or normal magnetic resonance imaging findings // Neurosurgery. - 2013. - Т. 73. - №. 1. - С. 68-77.

19. De Flon P. et al. Empirical evidence of underutilization of referrals for epilepsy surgery evaluation // European Journal of Neurology. - 2010. - Т. 17. - №. 4. - С. 619-625.

20. Berg A. T. et al. Understanding the delay before epilepsy surgery: who develops intractable focal epilepsy and when? // CNS spectrums. - 2004. - Т. 9. - №. 02. - С. 136-144.

21. Benbadis S.R. et al. Epilepsy surgery, delays and referral patterns-are all your epilepsy patients controlled? //Seizure. - 2003. - Т. 12. - №. 3. - С. 167-170.

22. Mierlo P. et al. Ictalonset localization through connectivity analysis of intracranial EEG signals in patients with refractory epilepsy // Epilepsia. - 2013. - Т. 54. - №. 8. - С. 1409-1418.

23. Tao J.X. et al. Cortical substrates of scalp EEG epileptiform discharges //Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology. - 2007. - Т. 24. - №. 2. - С. 96-100.

24. Carrette E. et al. Predictive factors for outcome of invasive video-EEG monitoring and subsequent resective surgery in patients with refractory epilepsy //Clinical neurology and neurosurgery. - 2010. - Т. 112. - №. 2. - С. 118-126.

25. Wellmer J. et al. Risks and benefits of invasive epilepsy surgery workup with implanted subdural and depth electrodes // Epilepsia. - 2012. - Т. 53. - №. 8. - С. 1322-1332.

26. Bien C.G. et al. Trends in presurgical evaluation and surgical treatment of epilepsy at one centre from 1988-2009 // Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry. - 2012. - С. jnnp-2011-301763.

27. Wong C. H. et al. Risk factors for complications during intracranial electrode recording in presurgical evaluation of drug resistant partial epilepsy // Acta neurochirurgica. - 2009. - Т. 151. - №. 1. - С. 37-50.

28. Falowski S.M. et al. Optimizations and Nuances in Neurosurgical Technique for the Minimization of Complications in Subdural Electrode Placement for Epilepsy Surgery //World Neurosurgery. - 2015.

29. Wiggins G.C., Elisevich K., Smith B. J. Morbidity and infection in combined subdural grid and strip electrode investigation for intractable epilepsy //Epilepsy research. - 1999. - Т. 37. - №. 1. - С. 73-80.

30. Arya R. et al. Adverse events related to extraoperative invasive EEG monitoring with subdural grid electrodes: A systematic review and metaanalysis // Epilepsia. - 2013. - Т. 54. - №. 5. - С. 828-839.

31. Fountas K.N., Smith J. R. Subdural electrode-associated complications: a 20-year experience // Stereotactic and functional neurosurgery. - 2006. - Т. 85. - №. 6. - С. 264-272.

32. Nilsson L. et al. Mortality in a Populationbased Cohort of Epilepsy Surgery Patients // Epilepsia. - 2003. - Т. 44. - №. 4. - С. 575-581.

33. Ryvlin P., Kahane P. Does epilepsy surgery lower the mortality of drug-resistant epilepsy? // Epilepsy research. - 2003. - Т. 56. - №. 2. - С. 105-120.

34. Hader W.J. et al. Complications of epilepsy surgery-A systematic review of focal surgical resections and invasive EEG monitoring // Epilepsia. - 2013. - Т. 54. - №. 5. - С. 840-847.

35. Beisse F. et al. [Visual field defects after epilepsy surgery: Implications for driving license tenure] // Der Ophthalmologe: Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft. - 2014. - Т. 111. - №. 10. - С. 942-947.

36. Van Baarsen K.M., Porro G.L., Wittebol-Post D. Epilepsy surgery provides new insights in retinotopic organization of optic radiations. A systematic review // Current opinion in ophthalmology. - 2009. - Т. 20. - №. 6. - С. 490-494.

37. Winston G.P. et al. Preventing visual field deficits from neurosurgery // Neurology. - 2014. - Т. 83. - №. 7. - С. 604-611.

38. Mathern G.W., Beninsig L., Nehlig A. From the Editors: Epilepsia’s survey on the necessity of the Wada test and intracranial electrodes for cortical mapping // Epilepsia. - 2014. - Т. 55. - №. 12. - С. 1887-1889.

39. Loddenkemper T., Morris H. H., Mцddel G. Complications during the Wada test // Epilepsy & Behavior. - 2008. - Т. 13. - №. 3. - С. 551-553.