Contemporary approaches to stereotactic biopsy of central nervous system tumors: challenges of non-diagnostic results
https://doi.org/10.63769/1683-3295-2026-28-2-67-76
Abstract
Background. Modern neuro-oncology requires morphological and molecular genetic verification of central nervous system tumors to determine the optimal treatment strategy. Despite the high information yield of neuroimaging methods, a definitive diagnosis in most cases can only be established based on histological tissue examination. Stereotactic biopsy (STB) is a minimally invasive method for obtaining diagnostic material; however, the problem of uninformative results remains clinically significant.
Aim. To assess the diagnostic effectiveness and identify the main causes of non-diagnostic results of STB in patients with brain tumors.
Materials and methods. A retrospective analysis of 172 STB performed at the National Medical Research Center of Neurosurgery named after Academician N.N. Burdenko in 2023–2024 was conducted. All patients underwent comprehensive neuroimaging (computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging) as well as histological and molecular genetic examination of the biopsy specimens.
Results. The diagnostic yield of STB was 92.4 % (n = 159) and increased to 95.9 % (n = 165) after repeat histological review. The main cause of non-diagnostic biopsies (n = 7) was technical planning errors, primarily incorrect target selection. The presence of diagnostically significant tumor tissue at intraoperative (frozen-section) examination was statistically significantly associated with the final diagnostic yield of the procedure.
Conclusion. STB remains a highly effective and relatively safe method for obtaining diagnostic material in patients with brain tumors. In the era of modern neuro-oncology, it plays a key role in morphological and molecular verification, which determines treatment strategy. The implementation of intraoperative histological control and the standardization of STB protocols may further improve diagnostic accuracy and procedural reproducibility.
About the Authors
S. A. MaryashevRussian Federation
16 4th Tverskaya-Yamskaya St., Moscow 125047
A. A. Veselkov
Russian Federation
Aleksey Aleksandrovich Veselkov
16 4th Tverskaya-Yamskaya St., Moscow 125047
E. A. Trubnikov
Russian Federation
16 4th Tverskaya-Yamskaya St., Moscow 125047
M. V. Ryzhova
Russian Federation
16 4th Tverskaya-Yamskaya St., Moscow 125047
A. V. Gavryushin
Russian Federation
16 4th Tverskaya-Yamskaya St., Moscow 125047
D. Kh. Bagratunyan
Russian Federation
Build. 4, 2 Bolshaya Pirogovskaya St., Moscow 119435
G. L. Kobyakov
Russian Federation
16 4th Tverskaya-Yamskaya St., Moscow 125047
A. A. Poddubskiy
Russian Federation
16 4th Tverskaya-Yamskaya St., Moscow 125047
I. N. Pronin
Russian Federation
16 4th Tverskaya-Yamskaya St., Moscow 125047
References
1. Kim J.E. Stereotactic biopsy for intracranial lesions: reliability and safety. Neurosurgery 2003;52(1):58–62. DOI: 10.1227/01.NEU.0000057137.24514.6C
2. Apuzzo M.L.J., Chandrasoma P.T., Cohen D. et al. Computed imaging stereotaxy: experience and perspective related to 500 procedures applied to brain masses. Neurosurgery 1987;20(6):930–7. PMID: 3500462.
3. Dammers R., Schouten J.W, Haitsma I.K. et al. Towards improving the safety and diagnostic yield of stereotactic biopsy in a single centre. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2010;152(11):1915–21. DOI: 10.1007/s00701-010-0711-6
4. Callovini G.M. Correlation with final histological diagnosis in supratentorial gliomas: is it appropriate to redefine the indication for stereotactic brain biopsy in the MRI era? Minim Invasive Neurosurg 2008;51(2):109–13. DOI: 10.1055/s-2008-1074336
5. Waters J.D., Vachhrajani S., Chambers W. et al. Diagnostic yield of stereotactic needle biopsies of intracranial lesions <1 cm. Surg Neurol Int 2013;4:176. DOI: 10.4103/2152-7806.122418
6. Katzendobler S., Birski M., Ghazale H. et al. Diagnostic yield and complication rate of stereotactic serial biopsy: a multicenter analysis of >1,200 patients. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2022;220:107296. DOI: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2022.107296
7. Takahashi H., Sugai T., Uzuka T. et al. [Complications and diagnostic yield of stereotactic biopsy for the patients with malignant brain tumors]. No Shinkei Geka 2004;32(2):135–40. Japanese. PMID: 15031974
8. Mathon B., Amelot A., Mokhtari K., Bielle F. Increasing the diagnostic yield of stereotactic brain biopsy using intraoperative histological smear. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2019;186:105544. DOI: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2019.105544
9. Pasternak K.A., Michael K.W., Warneke N. et al. Evaluation of 311 contemporary cases of stereotactic biopsies: diagnostic yield and management of nondiagnostic cases. Neurosurg Rev 2021;44(5):2597–609. DOI: 10.1007/s10143-020-01394-0
10. Malaizé H., Laigle-Donadey F., Riche M. et al. Roles and outcomes of stereotactic biopsy for adult brainstem lesions: diagnostic yield and safety. J Neurosurg 2022;136(2):297–307. DOI: 10.3171/2021.6.JNS211109
11. Singh M., Waseem Ahamed T.P., Maurya V.P. et al. Stereotactic biopsy for brain lesions: doing more with less. J Neurosci Rural Pract 2024;15(1):95–102. DOI: 10.25259/JNRP_258_2023
12. Vijian K., Lau B.L., Kanesen D. et al. Improving diagnostic yield and accuracy of stereotactic biopsies through changes in practice and techniques: an 8-year single-center comparative study. Asian J Neurosurg 20242;19(4):701–6. DOI: 10.1055/s-0044-1789593
13. Kumar R., McQuinn M.W., Pais A.B. et al. Comparison of diagnostic yields, operative times, and post-operative hemorrhage between twist drill versus burr hole craniotomy approaches for stereotactic needle brain biopsy. Neurosurg Rev 2024;47(1):819. DOI: 10.1007/s10143-024-03015-6
14. He L., He D., Qi Y. et al. Stereotactic biopsy for brainstem lesions: a meta-analysis of diagnostic yield. Cancer Control 2021;28:10732748211059858. DOI: 10.1177/10732748211059858
15. Louis D.N., Perry A., Wesseling P. et al. The 2021 WHO classification of tumors of the central nervous system: a summary. Neuro Oncol 2021;23(8):1231–51. DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noab106
16. Chen C.C., Hsu P.W., Wu T.W. et al. Stereotactic brain biopsy: single-center retrospective analysis of complications and outcomes. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2009;111(10):835–9. DOI: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2009.08.013
17. Jain D., Sharma M.C., Sarkar C. et al. Correlation of diagnostic yield of stereotactic brain biopsy with number of biopsy bits and site of the lesion. Brain Tumor Pathol 2006;23(2):71–5. DOI: 10.1007/s10014-006-0204-y
18. Castle M., Nájera E., Samprón N. et al. Frameless stereotactic biopsy: diagnostic yield and complications. Neurocirugia (Astur) 2014;25(2):56–61. Spanish. DOI: 10.1016/j.neucir.2013.11.003 19. Taweesomboonyat C., Tunthanathip T., Sae-Heng S., Oearsakul T. Diagnostic Yield and Complication of Frameless Stereotactic Brain Biopsy J Neurosci Rural Pract 2019;10(1):78–84. DOI: 10.4103/jnrp.jnrp_166_18
19. Arbit E., Galicich J.H. Importance of image-guided stereotactic biopsy to confirm diagnosis in an oncological setting. Ann Surg Oncol 1994;1(5):368–72. DOI: 10.1007/BF02303807
Review
For citations:
Maryashev S.A., Veselkov A.A., Trubnikov E.A., Ryzhova M.V., Gavryushin A.V., Bagratunyan D.Kh., Kobyakov G.L., Poddubskiy A.A., Pronin I.N. Contemporary approaches to stereotactic biopsy of central nervous system tumors: challenges of non-diagnostic results. Russian journal of neurosurgery. 2026;28(2):67-76. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.63769/1683-3295-2026-28-2-67-76
JATS XML

























