Invasive monitoring of electrical activity of the brain in patients with acute massive subarachnoid hemorrhage due to cerebral aneurysm rupture

Background. Invasive monitoring of electrical activity of the brain (invasive electroencephalography (EEG)) can have a number of advantages in diagnosis of early damage and delayed ischemia of the brain during cerebral vascular spasm due to its higher sensitivity and lower number of artifacts compared to noninvasive (scalp) monitoring. However, there are no standards of invasive electrode placement and registration of invasive recording. We present clinical experience of invasive prolonged EEG monitoring in patients during the acute period of cerebral aneurysm rupture.

Aim. To develop technique of invasive EEG monitoring in patients with cerebral aneurysm rupture and to evaluate characteristics of the observed electrographic changes.

Materials and methods. Series of clinical observations are presented: 6 patients who were operated on in the acute period of nontraumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage and who underwent simultaneous scalp and invasive EEG monitoring.

Results. Pathologic changes observed during EEG correlated with development of areas of cerebral ischemia. Changes registered during invasive EEG were more pronounced and appeared earlier than during scalp monitoring.

Conclusion. Informativity of invasive EEG monitoring in diagnosis of delayed cerebral ischemia and seizureless epileptiform activity is higher compared to scalp EEG monitoring.

1. Hemorrhagic stroke. Clinical guidelines of the Ministry of Health of Russia. Moscow, 2022. 78 p. (In Russ.). Available: http://disuria.ru/_ld/12/1225_kr22I60I62MZ.pdf

2. Krylov V.V., Vinokurov A.G., Dashyan V.G. et al. Microsurgery of cerebral aneurysms. Moscow: ABV-Press, 2022. 856 p. (In Russ.).

3. Krylov V.V., Dashyan V.G., Shatokhin T.A. et al. The timing of open surgical treatment for patients with massive basal subarachnoid hemorrhage (Fisher 3) because of cerebral aneurysms rupture. Neyrokhirurgiya = Russian Journal of Neurosurgery. 2015;(3):11–7. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.17650/1683-3295-2015-0-3-11-17

4. Krylov V.V., Konovalov A.N., Dashyan V.G. et al. The current state of neurosurgery in Russian Federation. Neyrokhirurgiya = Russian Journal of Neurosurgery 2016;(3):3–44. (In Russ.).

5. Krylov V.V., Prirodov A.V., Kuznetcova T.K. The surgical methods for prevention and treatment of cerebral angiospasm at patients suffered from rupture of cerebral aneurysms. Neyrokhirurgiya = Russian Journal of Neurosurgery. 2014;(1):104–15. (In Russ.).

6. Margerison J.H., Binnie C.D., McCaul I.R. Electroencephalographic signs employed in the location of ruptured intracranial arterial aneurysms. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1970;28(3):296–306. DOI: 10.1016/0013-4694(70)90166-5

7. Parkes J.D., James I.M. Electroencephalographic and cerebral blood flow changes following spontaneous subarachnoid haemorrhage. Brain 1971;94(1):69–76. DOI: 10.1093/brain/94.1.69

8. Waziri A., Claassen J., Stuart R.M. et al. Intracortical electroencephalography in acute brain injury. Ann Neurol 2009;66(3):366–77. DOI: 10.1002/ana.21721

9. Stuart R.M., Waziri A., Weintraub D. et al. Intracortical EEG for the detection of vasospasm in patients with poor-grade subarachnoid hemorrhage. Neurocrit Care 2010;13(3):355–8. DOI: 10.1007/s12028-010-9414-6

10. Frontera J.A., Claassen J., Schmidt J.M. et al. Prediction of symptomatic vasospasmafter subarachnoid hemorrhage: the modified Fisher scale. Neurosurgery 2006;59(1):21–7. DOI: 10.1227/01.neu.0000243277.86222.6c

11. Vergouwen M.D., Vermeulen M., van Gijn J. et al. Definition of delayed cerebral ischemia after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage as an outcome event in clinical trials and observational studies: proposal of a multidisciplinary research group. Stroke 2010;41(10):2391–5. DOI: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.589275

12. Claassen J., Perotte A., Albers D. et al. Nonconvulsive seizures after subarachnoid hemorrhage: multimodal detection and outcomes. Ann Neurol 2013;74(1):53–64. DOI: 10.1002/ana.23859

13. Jeffcote T., Hinzman J.M., Jewell S.L. et al. Detection of spreading depolarization with intraparenchymal electrodes in the injured human brain. Neurocrit Care 2014;20(1):21–31. DOI: 10.1007/s12028-013-9938-7

14. Yuan F., Damien C., Schuind S. et al. Combined depth and scalp electroencephalographic monitoring in acute brain injury: yield and prognostic value. Eur J Neurol 2024;31(4):e16208. DOI: 10.1111/ene.16208

15. Al Barajraji M., Bogossian E., Dewitte O. et al. Safety profile of an intracranial multimodal monitoring bolt system for neurocritical care: a single-center experience. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2021;163(12):3259–66. DOI: 10.1007/s00701-021-04992-z