Classification of unstable spinal gunshot wounds: interim results of the 2^nd phase of the study

Background. Gunshot wounds are the most common type of spinal cord and spinal cord injury in battlefields. In some cases, spinal cord injury leads to instability in the spinal motion segment. A protocol for scoring tactical classification of unstable gunshot wounds of the thoracolumbar spine was developed.

Aim. To analyze the interexpert agreement in assessing the “significance” of a fracture of a specific anatomical structure and deciding on the influence of this injury on the necessity to perform stabilizing intervention.

Materials and methods. An evaluation of 30 anonymized clinical and radiological cases by 15 surgeons was performed. Each surgeon completed 30 questionnaires based on the computed tomography images. A kappa (к) coefficient was used to determine the degree of agreement between surgeons in the points of view on the stability and contribution to destabilization of each anatomic structure.

Results. A good level of inter-expert agreement was demonstrated in surgeons' detection of posterior osseous-ligamentous complex injury (к = 0.854), assessment of its significance (к = 0.56), detection of transverse processes fracture (к = 0.664), arch joints (к = 0.521), arch root (к = 0.717) and its significance (к = 0.4), and vertebral body (к = 0.655). All surgeons found that fracture of two arch roots resulted in absolute fracture instability. A good level of agreement was also demonstrated in the overall assessment of the fracture: unstable fracture, к = 0.41; stable fracture, к = 0.55; the level of agreement on the applicability of the McCormack classification was 0.406.

Conclusion. High level of inter-expert concordance on the fact of injury of the structures proposed in the questionnaire was obtained which demonstrates accuracy of identification of skeletal elements affecting development of instability. Preliminary evaluation of the results does not allow to make judgement on certain concordance in assessment of significance of injuries of these structures. Critical impact of bilateral fractures of the articular processes or pedicles of the vertebral arch requiring stabilizing intervention was established. The aim of further studies is final analysis of inter-expert and intra-expert concordance. Based on the analysis of the experts' answers, classification of primary spinal instability in thoracic and lumbar gunshot wounds will be developed. Additionally, evaluation of clinical situations by expert surgeons with subsequent statistical analysis will be performed to improve reliability and reproducibility of the new classification system.

1. Dulaev A.K., Orlov V.P. Surgical treatment of military personnel with combat-related spinal injuries in the Chechen Republic. In: State and Prospects of Military Traumatology and Orthopedics. Saint Peterburg, 1999. Pp. 253–6. (In Russ.).

2. The experience of soviet medicine in the Great Patriotic War of 1941–1945. Ed. by E.I. Smirnov. Volume 11. Moscow: Medgiz, 1952. 415 p. (In Russ.).

3. Blair J.A. Patzkowski J.C., Schoenfeld A.J. et al. Spinal column injuries among Americans in the global war on terrorism. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2012;94(18):e135(1–9). DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.K.00502

4. Vaccaro A.R., Oner C., Kepler C.K. et al. AOS pine thoracolumbar spine injury classification system: fracture description, neurological status, and key modifiers. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2013;38(23): 2028–37. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182a8a381

5. Vaccaro A.R., Lehman R.A. Jr., Hurlbert R.J. et al. A new classification of thoracolumbar injuries: the importance of injury morphology, the integrity of the posterior ligamentous complex, and neurologic status. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2005;30(20):2325–33. DOI: 10.1097/01.brs.0000182986.43345.cb

6. Military field surgery. National guidelines. Ed. by I.M. Samokhvalov. 2nd edn., revised and added. Moscow: GEOTAR-Media, 2024. 1056 p. (In Russ.).

7. Practical Neurosurgery: a guide for physicians. Ed. by B.V. Gaidar. Saint Petersburg: Gippokrat, 2002. 648 p. (In Russ.).

8. Duz B., Cansever T., Secer H.I. et al. Evaluation of spinal missile injuries with respect to bullet trajectory, surgical indications and timing of surgical intervention: a new guideline. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2008;33(20):E746–53. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31818579a7

9. Esipov A.V., Antonov G.I., Manukovsky V.A. et al. Scoring system for unstable spinal gunshot wounds: the study protocol. Zhurnal Voprosy neyrokhirurgii im. N.N. Burdenko = Burdenko’s Journal of Neurosurgery 2024;88(4):56–61. (In Russ., in Engl.). DOI: 10.17116/neiro20248804156

10. Tetzlaff J.M., Moher D., Chan A.-W. Developing a guideline for clinical trial protocol content: Delphi consensus survey. Trials 2012;13:176. DOI: 10.1186/1745-6215-13-176

11. Kotiv B.N., Samokhvalov I.M., Chuprina A.P. et al. Guidelines for military field surgery. Moscow: Ministry of Defense of Russia, 2020. 488 p.

12. Denis F. The three column spine and its significance in the classification of acute thoracolumbar spinal injuries. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1983;8(8):817–31. DOI: 10.1097/00007632-198311000-00003

13. Fleiss J.L., Levin B., Cho Paik M. Statistical methods for rates & proportions. 3rd edn. John Wiley & Sons., 2003.

14. McCormack T., Karaikovic E., Gaines R.W. The load sharing classification of spine fractures. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1994;19(15):1741–4. DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199408000-00014

15. Bhat A.R., Wani M.A., Kirmani A.R. et al. Missile injuries of spine and spinal cord in civilian Kashmir – Analysis and outcome evaluated by new Modified SKIMS-Functional Scales. Indian J Neurotraum Thiem Med Sci 2012;9(2):99–111. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijnt.2012.11.012

16. Volkov P.V., Grin A.A. Surgical treatment of patients with gunshot and stab-cut wounds of the spine and spinal cord. Neirokhirurgiya = Russian Journal of Neurosurgery 2010;2:72–9. (In Russ.).

17. Grin A.A. Surgical treatment of patients with spinal cord and spine damage in combined trauma. Abstract of dis. … doct. med. sci. Moscow, 2008. 48 p. (In Russ.).

18. Audigé L., Bhandari M., Hanson B., Kellam J. A concept for the validation of fracture classifications. J Orthop Trauma 2005;19(6):404–9. DOI: 10.1097/01.bot.0000155310.04886.37