Interspinous fixation in the surgical treatment of lumbar osteochondrosis
Abstract
This literature review presents the current data concerning the usage of interspinous vertebral fixation in the surgery of degenerative-distrophic diseases of lumbar spine. The biomechanical argumentation of such implants usage is presented. The results of the most important studies of clinical efficacy of interspinous vertebral fixation are described. The data of various studies comparing efficacy of interspinous vertebral fixation with other surgical methods for lumbar degenerative disease treatment are shown. The indications and contraindications for this technique usage are discussed.
About the Authors
A. S. Nikitin
Городская клиническая больница №12 ДЗ г. Москвы
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
S. A. Asratyan
Городская клиническая больница №12 ДЗ г. Москвы
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
References
1. Алейник А.Я., Млявых С.Г., Боков А.Е. и соавт. Анализ неудовлетворительных результатов межостистой динамической стабилизации при дегенеративных заболеваниях поясничного отдела позвоночника // Хирургия позвоночника. - 2013. - №3. - С. 44-52.
2. Алейник А.Я., Млявых С.Г., Боков А.Е. и соавт. Межостистая динамическая стабилизация DIAM в лечении дегенеративных заболеваний на уровне L5-S1 // Медицинский альманах. - 2012. - №1(20) - С. 122-125.
3. Баматов А.Б., Древаль О.Н., Кузнецов А.В. Влияние межостистого имплантата на динамику болевого синдрома и качество жизни пациентов с дегенеративной болезнью поясничного отдела позвоночника // Нейрохирургия. - 2014. - № 1. - С. 41-46.
4. Гармиш А.Р., Падченко Ю.Е., Радченко В.А., Левшин А.В. Применение динамической системы межостистой стабилизации («и»-имплант) в лечении стеноза позвоночного канала на уровне поясничного отдела // Украинский нейрохирургический журнал. 2007. - №1. - C. 59-63.
5. Попелянский Я.Ю. Ортопедическая неврология (вертеброневрология). Руководство для врачей М.: Медпресс-информ, 2011. - C.13
6. Хижняк М.В., Новакович К.С. Хирургическое лечение рецидивов грыж межпозвонковых дисков поясничного отдела позвоночника с применением систем межостистой стабилизации // Медицинский журнал. - 2013. - №2. - С. 151-152.
7. Хижняк М., Педаченко Ю, Танасейчук А, Крамаренко В. Микродискэктомия в сочетании с системой межостисто й стабилизации при мультифакторной компрессии поясничного отдела позвоночника // Украинский нейрохирургический журнал. - 2012. - №3. - C. 27-30.
8. Adelt D., Samani J., Kim W et al. Coflex, Interspinous Stabilization: Clinical and Radiographic Results from an International Multicenter Retrospective Study // MS Paradigm Spine Journal. - 2007. - Vol.1. - P. 1-4.
9. Bowers C, Amini A., Dailey A., Schmidt M. Dynamic interspinous process stabilization: Review of complications associated with the X-STOP device // Neurosurg Focus. - 2010. - Vol.28. - P.E8.
10. Caserta S., La Maida G., Misaggi B, et al. Elastic stabilization alone or combined with rigid fusion in spinal surgery: a biomechanical study and clinical experience based on 82 cases // Eur Spine J. - 2002. - Vol. 11(2). - P. 192-197.
11. Chen B., Wei F., Ueyama K. et al. Adjacent segment degeneration after single-segment PLIF: the risk factor for degeneration and its impact on clinical outcomes // Eur Spine J. - 2011. - Vol.20. - P. 1946-1950.
12. Chen W., Lai P., Chen L., Gung C. Adjacent Instability after Instrumented Lumbar Fusion // Med J. - 2003. - Vol.26. - P. 792-798.
13. Davis R., Auerbach J., Bae H., Errico T. Can low-grade spondylolisthesis be effectively treated by either coflex interlaminar stabilization or laminectomy and posterior spinal fusion? Two-year clinical and radiographic results from the randomized, prospective, multicenter US investigational device exemption trial // J Neurosurg Spine. - 2013. - Vol.19 - P. 174-184.
14. Davis R., Errico T., Bae H., Auerbach J. Decompression and Coflex interlaminar stabilization compared with decompression and instrumented spinal fusion for spinal stenosis and low-grade degenerative spondylolisthesis: two-year results from the prospective, randomized, multicenter, Food and Drug Administration Investigational Device Exemption trial // Spine (Phila Pa 1976). - 2013. -Vol.38(18). - P. 1529-1539.
15. Epstein N. A review of interspinous fusion devices: High complication, reoperation rates, and costs with poor outcomes // Surg Neurol Int. - 2012. - Vol.3. - P. 7-14.
16. Fabrizi A., Maina R., Schiabello L. Interspinous spacers in the treatment of degenerative lumbar spinal disease: our experience with DIAM and Aperius devices // Eur Spine J. - 2011. - Vol.20. - P. 20-26.
17. Fairbank J., Couper J., Davies J. The Oswestry low back pain disability questionnaire // Physiotherapy. - 1980. - Vol.66. - P. 271-273.
18. Floman Y., Millgram M., Smorgick Y. et al. Failure of the Wallis interspinous implant to lower the incidence of recurrent lumbar disc herniations in patients undergoing primary disc excision // J Spinal Disord Tech. - 2007. - Vol.20(5). - P. 337-41.
19. Fuchs P., Lindsey D., Hsu K. et al. The use of an interspinous implant in conjunction with a graded facetectomy procedure // Spine. - 2005. - Vol. 30(11). - P. 1266-1272.
20. Gazzeri R., Galarza M., Alfieri A. Controversies about Interspinous Process Devices in the Treatment of Degenerative Lumbar Spine Diseases: Past, Present, and Future // BioMed Research International. - 2014. -Vol.l - P.l-15.
21. Hobart J., Gilkes C, Adams W., Germon T. Interspinous spacers for lumbar foraminal stenosis: formal trials are justified // Eur Spine J. - 2013. - Vol.22. - P. 47-53.
22. Holinka J., Krepler P., Matzner M., Grohs J. Stabilising effect of dynamic interspinous spacers in degenerative low-grade lumbar instability // International Orthopaedics (SICOT). - 2011. - Vol.35. - P. 395-400.
23. Kim A, Mcdonald M., Pik J. et al. Dynamic Intraspinous Spacer Technology for Posterior Stabilization: Case-control Study on the Safety, Sagittal Angulation, and Pain Outcome at 1-year Follow-up Evaluation Disclosures // Neurosurg Focus. - 2007. - Vol.22(1) - P. E7.
24. Kim D., Tantorski M., Shaw J. et al. Occult spinous process fractures associated with interspinous process spacers // Spine. - 2011.- Vol. 36. - P. E1080-1085.
25. Kim M., Park K., Hwang C. et al. Recurrence Rate of Lumbar Disc Herniation After Open Discectomy in Active Young Men // Spine. - 2009. - Vol.34(1). - P. 24-29.
26. Khoueir P., Kim A., Michael Y. Wang M. Classification of Posterior Dynamic Stabilization Device // Neurosurg Focus. - 2007. - Vol. 22(1) - P. E3.
27. Kong D., Kim E., Eoh W. One-year Outcome Evaluation after Interspinous Implantation for Degenerative Spinal Stenosis with Segmental Instability // J Korean Med Sci. - 2007. - Vol.22. - P. 330-335.
28. Korovessis P., Repantis T., Zacharatos S., Zaropoulos A. Does Wallis implant reduce adjacent segment degeneration above lumbosacral instrumented fusion? // Eur Spine J. - 2009. - Vol.18. - P. 830-840.
29. Kumar N., Shah S., Hong Y., et al. Role of Coflex as an Adjunct to Decompression for Symptomatic Lumbar Spinal Stenosis // Asian Spine J. - 2014. - Vol. 8(2) - P. 161-169.
30. Kim T., Lee B., Moon S., et al. Comparison of adjacent segment degeneration after successful posterolateral fusion with unilateral or bilateral pedicle screw instrumentation: a minimum 10-year follow-up // Spine J. - 2013. - Vol.13(10). - P. 1208-1216.
31. Lee J., Hida K., Seki T., et al. An interspinous process distractor (X STOP) for lumbar spinal stenosis in elderly patients: preliminary experiences in 10 consecutive cases // Journal of Spinal Disorders and Techniques. - 2004. - Vol.17 (1). - P. 72-77.
32. Lehmann T., Spratt K., Tozzi J., et al. Long-term follow-up of lower lumbar fusion patients // Spine (Phila Pa 1976). - 1987. - Vol.12(2). - P. 97-104.
33. McCormack H., Horne D., Sheather S. Clinical applications of visual analogue scales: a critical review // Psychol Med. - 1988. - Vol.18. - P. 1007-1019.
34. McGirt M. Ambrossi G., Datoo G., et al. Recurrent disc herniation and long-term back pain after primary lumbar discectomy: review of outcomes reported for limited versus aggressive disc removal // Neurosurgery. - 2009. - Vol.64. P. 338-345.
35. Meirhaeghe J., Fransen P., Morelli D., et al. Clinical evaluation of the preliminary safety and effectiveness of a minimally invasive interspinous process device APERIUS((R)) in degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis with symptomatic neurogenic intermittent claudication // Eur Spine J. - 2012. - Vol.21. - P. 2565-2572.
36. Menchetti P., Postacchini F., Bini W., Canero G. Percutaneous surgical treatment in lumbar spinal stenosis with Aperius-PercLID: indications, surgical technique and results // Acta Neurochir Suppl. - 2011. -Vol.108. - P.183-186.
37. Miller L., Block J. Clinical Study Interspinous Spacer Implant in Patients withLumbar Spinal Stenosis: Preliminary Results of a Multicenter, Randomized, Controlled Trial // Hindawi Publishing Corporation Pain Research and Treatment. - 2012. - Vol.1. - P. 1-10.
38. Moojen W., Arts M., Jacobs W. et al. The Hague Spine Intervention Prognostic Study Group. Interspinous process device versus standard conventional surgical decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis: randomized controlled trial // BMJ. - 2013. - Vol.14. - P. 347.
39. Nachanakian A., Helou A., Alaywan M. The Interspinous Spacer: A New Posterior Dynamic Stabilization Concept for Prevention of Adjacent Segment Disease // Advances in Orthopedics. - 2013. - Vol. 63. - P. 3-10.
40. Niu C., Chen W., Chen L., Shih C. Reduction-fixation spinal system in spondylolisthesis. // Am J. Orthop. (Belle Mead NJ). - 1996. - Vol.25(6). - P. 418-24.
41. Park S., Yoon S., Hong Y., et al. Minimum 2-Year Follow-Up Result of Degenerative Spinal Stenosis Treated with Interspinous U (Coflex(TM)) // J Korean Neurosurg Soc. - 2009. - Vol. 46(4). - P. 292-299.
42. Richards J., Majumdar S., Lindsey D., et al. The treatment mechanism of an interspinous process implant for lumbar neurogenic intermittent claudication // Spine. - 2005. - Vol. 30. - P. 744-749.
43. Richter A, Schutz C., Hauck M., Halm H. Does an interspinous device (CoflexTM) improve the outcome of decompressive surgery in lumbar spinal stenosis? One-year follow up of a prospective case control study of 60 patients // Eur Spine J. - 2010. - Vol.19. - P. 283-289.
44. Rolfe K., Zucherman J., Kondrashov D., et al. Scoliosis and interspinous decompression with the X-STOP: Prospective minimum 1-year outcomes in lumbar spinal stenosis // Spine J. - 2010. -Vol.10. - P. 972-978.
45. Senegas J. Mechanical supplementation by non-rigid fixation in degenerative intervertebral lumbar segments: the wallis system // European Spine Journal. - 2002. - Vol. 11(2). - P. 164-169.
46. Shabat S., Miller L., Block J., Gepstein R. Minimally invasive treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis with a novel interspinous spacer // Clin Interv Aging. - 2011. - Vol.6. P. 227-233.
47. Siddiqui M., Nicol M., Karadimas E., et al. The positional magnetic resonance imaging changes in the lumbar spine following insertion of a novel interspinous process distraction device // Spine (Phila Pa 1976). - 2005. - Vol.30(23). - P. 2677-2682.
48. Sobottke R., Schluter-Brust K., Kaulhausen T. et al. Interspinous implants (X Stop, Wallis, Diam) for the treatment of LSS: is there a correlation between radiological parameters and clinical outcome? // Eur Spine J. - 2009. - Vol.18. - P. 1494-1503.
49. Stucki G., Daltroy L., Liang M., et al. Measurement properties of a self-administered outcome measure in lumbar spinal stenosis // Spine. - 1996. - Vol. 21. - P. 796-803.
50. Swanson K., Lindsey D., Hsu K., et al. The effects of an interspinous implant on intervertebral disc pressures // Spine. - 2003 - Vol.28 (l). - P. 26-32.
51. Tamburrelli F., Proietti L., Logroscino C. Critical analysis of lumbar interspinous devices failures: a retrospective study // Eur Spine J. - 2011. - Vol.20(1). - P. 27-35.
52. Tsai K., Murakami H., Lowery G., Hutton W. A biomechanical evaluation of an interspinous device (Coflex) used to stabilize the lumbar spine // Journal of Surgical Orthopaedic Advances. - 2006. - Vol.15 (3). - P. 167-172.
53. Tsou H., Kao T. Successful Treatment of Recurrent Lumbar Disc Herniation Following Microlaminotomy and Discectomy with Interspinous Device Implantation Using Percutaneous Endoscopic Discectomy //Materials of ISASS14 MIS Techniques and Outcomes. - 2014. - Vol. 1 - P. 400-424.
54. Turner J., Ersek M., Herron L., Deyo R. Surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis: attempted meta-analysis of the literature // Spine. - 1992. - Vol. 17 (l). - P. 1-8.
55. Verhoof O., Bron J., Wapstra F., Barend J. High failure rate of the interspinous distraction device (X-Stop) for the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis caused by degenerative spondylolisthesis // Eur Spine J. - 2008. - Vol. 17. - P. 188-192.
56. Wilke H., Drumm J., Haeussler K., et al. Biomechanical effect of different lumbar interspinous implants on exibility and intradiscal pressure // Eur Spine J. - 2008. - Vol.17. - P. 1049-1056.
57. Wiseman C, Lindsey D., Fredrick A., Yerby S. The effect of an interspinous process implant on facet loading during extension // Spine (Phila Pa 1976). - 2005. - Vol.30(8). - Vol. 903-907.
58. Zencica P., Chaloupka R., Hladnkorb J., Krbec M. Adjacent segment degeneration after lumbosacral fusion in spondylolisthesis: a retrospective radiological and clinical analysis // Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. - 2010. - Vol.77(2). - P. 24-30.
59. Zucherman J., Hsu K., Hartjen C. A multicenter, prospective, randomized trial evaluating the X STOP interspinous process decompression system for the treatment of neurogenic intermittent claudication: two-year follow-up results // Spine. - 2005. - Vol. 30(12). - P. 1351-1358.
60. Xu C., Ni W, Tian N., et al. (2013) Complications in degenerative lumbar disease treated with a dynamic interspinous spacer (Coflex) // Int Orthop. - 2013. - Vol.37. - P. 2199-2204.
Review
For citations:
Nikitin A.S., Asratyan S.A. Interspinous fixation in the surgical treatment of lumbar osteochondrosis. Russian journal of neurosurgery. 2015;(2):92-97. (In Russ.)
Views:
691
Email this article 