A rare case of instability and rod migration after C1–C2–C3–C4 screw fixation (clinical case and literature review)

Background. The rate of mechanical complications (screw system instability and hardware migration) associated with dorsal instrumental fixation of the cervical spine after injury ranges between 2 and 5 %. Implant migration, particularly of rods, following dorsal screw fixation of the cervical spine is a rare but potentially dangerous complication. Such complications can lead to severe neurological consequences and requires timely intervention.

Aim. To analyze a clinical case of instability and migration of metal hardware following screw fixation of the C1–C2–C3–C4 segments in a patient with traumatic fractures of the C2 and C3 vertebra, and to review literature to identify risk factors and methods for preventing such complications.

Material and methods. The study includes one clinical case of a patient who experienced complications – implant migration – after multilevel fixation of the cervical spine. Clinical examination, computed tomography (CT) were used to assess the condition of the patient and implants, along with a review of the literature on this issue.

Results. The patient was diagnosed with instability of the metal hardware and migration of the rod into the posterior cranial fossa (Fossa cranii posterior) causing neurologic symptoms. A second surgical intervention was performed to remove the metal hardware. The literature review revealed that such cases are rare and require careful approach to selection of fixation methods and postoperative monitoring.

Discussion. The analysis of the clinical case and the literature revealed possible causes of migration, including inadequate fixation and technical errors. Recommendations on prevention of such complications and patient management are proposed.

Conclusion. Rare cases of instability and migration of the metal hardware following multilevel screw fixation of the cervical spine require personalized approach to diagnosis and treatment. Performing spinal fusion with strict adherence to surgical technique, increased awareness, and strict postoperative monitoring can reduce the risk of complications and improve treatment outcomes.

1. Gubin A.V., Burtsev A.V. Posterior screw fixation of the craniofacial junction. Hirurgiâ pozvonočnika = Spine Surgery 2014;(2):42–8. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.14531/ss2014.2.42-48

2. Aleynik A.Y., Mlyavykh S.G., Bokov A.E. Transpedicular screw fixation of cervical spine: literature review and clinical data. Hirurgiâ pozvonočnika = Spine Surgery 2017;14(3):47–53. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.14531/ss2017.3.47-53

3. Magomedov S.S., Dokish M.Yu., Tatarintsev A.P. Transpedicular free-hand fixation in the subaxial cervical spine. Hirurgiâ pozvonočnika = Spine Surgery 2018;15(3):13–22. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.14531/ss2018.3.13-22

4. Basankin I.V., Giulzatyan А.А., Nesterenko P.B. et al. Experience of using transpedicular osteosynthesis in traumatic spondylolisthesis of the axis. Sovremennye tehnologii v medicine 2021;13(5):47. DOI: 10.17691/stm2021.13.5.06

5. Norkin I.A., Chekhonatsky A.A., Ninel V.G., Ostrovsky V.V. Treatment of cervical spine fracture in a patient with Bekhterev’s disease. Hirurgiâ pozvonočnika = Spine Surgery 2007;(2):23–5. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.14531/ss2007.2.23-25

6. Badiee R.K., Mayer R., Pennicooke B. et al. Complications following posterior cervical decompression and fusion: a review of incidence, risk factors, and prevention strategies. J Spine Surg 2020;6(1):323–3. DOI: 10.21037/jss.2019.11.01

7. Kiran B., Sharma A., Prashant G., Parekh A. A case report of rod migration into cerebellum through foramen magnum after lateral mass fixation of cervical spine. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2016;158(4):741–4. DOI: 10.1007/s00701-015-2693-0

8. Deen H.G., Nottmeier E.W., Reimer R. Early complications of posterior rod-screw fixation of the cervical and upper thoracic spine. Neurosurgery 2006;59(5):1062–7. DOI: 10.1227/01.NEU.0000245592.54204.D0

9. Dogan S., Gundogdu E.B., Taşkapılıoğlu M.Ö., Karaoglu A. Rod migration to the thoracic subarachnoid space after С1–С2 instrumentation: A case report and literature review. Orthop Surg 2017;9(1):129–32. DOI: 10.1111/os.12317

10. Plant J.G., Ruff S.J. Migration of rod through skull, into brain following C1–C2 instrumental fusion for os odontoideum: A case report. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2010;35(3):E90–2. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181ba03b3

11. Yablon I.G., Cowan S., Mortara R. The migration of a Harrington rod after cervical fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1993;18(3):356–8. DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199303000-00009

12. Chun H.J., Bak K.H., Kang T.H., Yi H.J. Rod migration into the fossa posterior after Harms operation: Case report and review of literatures. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 2010;47(3):221–3. DOI: 10.3340/jkns.2010.47.3.221

13. Mahtabfar A., Mazza J., Franco D. et al. Cranial settling causing intracranial hemorrhage through violation of the skull base by cervical spine instrumentation. World Neurosurg 2021;145:178–82. DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2020

14. Ezzat A.A., Salah A.M. Rod migration through foramen magnum into fossa posterior after cervical spine lateral mass fixation: A case report and literature review. Surg Neurol Int 2022;13:514. DOI: 10.25259/SNI_866_2022

15. Panjabi M.M., White A.A. 3rd. Basic biomechanics of the spine. Neurosurgery 1980;7(1):76–93. DOI: 10.1227/00006123-198007000–00014