Cases of vision loss after bifrontal access
https://doi.org/10.17650/1683-3295-2019-21-4-74-80
Abstract
The objective is to present 2 clinical cases of complete vision loss after bifrontal access during craniotomy due to vascular brain pathology.
Materials and methods. In one case, a bifrontal skin incision was used during subfrontal craniotomy to remove frontal lobe arteriovenous malformation, in the other one – to apply intracranial side-to-side anastomosis between A3 segments of both anterior cerebral arteries, and to clip proximal aneurysms of the anterior connecting artery and the anterior cerebral artery on the right. After the surgery, patients developed bilateral amaurosis and ophthalmoplegia. We analyzed data on patients’ general clinical condition and their ophthalmological status prior to the surgery, as well as surgical videos and anesthesia records.
Results. Intraoperative iatrogenic damage of cranial nerves and arteries was excluded. We distinguished that a suspected intraoperative factor, playing a decisive role, was a piece of skin applying direct pressure on the eyeballs. It was removed during the surgery.
Conclusion. To prevent the development of such a complication as vision loss, it is necessary to carefully evaluate all possible risks at preoperative and intraoperative stages. During the surgery, all organs and systems at risk should be monitored. It is important to prevent a sudden drop in blood pressure and massive blood loss. During craniotomy, any eyeballs compression must be avoided.
Conflict of interest. The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Informed consent. All patients gave written informed consent to publication of their data.
Keywords
About the Authors
D. I. VarfolomeevRussian Federation
developing the research design, participation in operations, analysis of the obtained data, reviewing of publications of the article’s theme, article writing
Novosibirsk
A. V. Dubovoy
Russian Federation
surgical treatment, analysis of the obtained data
Novosibirsk
A. O. Sosnov
Russian Federation
surgical treatment, analysis of the obtained data
Novosibirsk
O. Yu. Nakhabin
Russian Federation
surgical treatment, analysis of the obtained data
Novosibirsk
T. K. Istomina
Russian Federation
analysis of the obtained data, article writing
Novosibirsk
References
1. Newman N.J. Perioperative visual loss after nonocular surgeries. Am J Ophtalmol 2008;145(4):604–10. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2007.09.016.
2. Holmes G. The prognosis in papilloedema. Br J Ophthalmol 1937;21(7):337–42. DOI: 10.1136/bjo.21.7.337.
3. Rinaldi I., Botton J.E., Troland C.E. Cortical visual disturbances following ventriculography and/or ventricular decompression. J Neurosurg 1962;19:568–76. DOI: 10.3171/jns.1962.19.7.0568.
4. Beck R.W., Greenberg H.S. Postdecompression optic neuropathy. J Neurosurg 1985;63(2):196–9. DOI: 10.3171/jns.1985.63.2.0196.
5. Maier P., Feltgen N., Lagrèze W.A. Bilateral orbital infarction syndrome after bifrontal craniotomy. Arch Ophthalmol 2007;125(3):422–3. DOI: 10.1001/archopht.125.3.422.
6. Yamashita S., Takahashi H., Tanaka M. Bispectral index sensor as a possible cause of postoperative visual loss after frontal craniotomy. Br J Anaesth 2009;103(1):134. DOI: 10.1093/bja/aep153.
7. Choudhari K.A., Pherwani A.A. Sudden visual loss due to posterior ischemic optic neuropathy following craniotomy for a ruptured intracranial aneurysm. Neurol India 2007;55(2):163–5. DOI: 10.4103/0028-3886.32792.
8. Mukherjee S., Thakur B., Tolias C. Sudden-onset monocular blindness following orbito-zygomatic craniotomy for a ruptured intracranial aneurysm. BMJ Case Rep 2016;2016:bcr2014208393. DOI: 10.1136/bcr-2014-208393.
9. Takahashi Y., Kakizaki H., Selva D., Leibovitch I. Bilateral orbital compartment syndrome and blindness after cerebral aneurysm repair surgery. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg 2010;26(4):299–301. DOI: 10.1097/IOP.0b013e3181c062ca.
Review
For citations:
Varfolomeev D.I., Dubovoy A.V., Sosnov A.O., Nakhabin O.Yu., Istomina T.K. Cases of vision loss after bifrontal access. Russian journal of neurosurgery. 2019;21(4):74-80. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17650/1683-3295-2019-21-4-74-80