Preview

Russian journal of neurosurgery

Advanced search

REMOVAL OF SUPRASELLAR MENINGIOMAS VIA THE TRANSCILIARY SUPRAORBITAL APPROACH

https://doi.org/10.17650/1683-3295-2019-21-2-21-27

Abstract

The study objective is to compare the outcomes of surgeries performed via the transciliary supraorbital approach and traditional lateral supraorbital approach in patients with suprasellar meningiomas.
Material and methods. The experimental group included 17 patients (8 males and 9 females aged between 38 and 67 years (mean age 48.7 ± 5.9 years)) with meningotheliomatous meningiomas (size between 15 and 46 mm (mean size 24.5 ± 5.7 mm) that underwent surgery via the transciliary supraorbital approach. All surgeries were performed by one surgeon. The control group included 20 patients (10 males and 10 females) that underwent surgery via the lateral supraorbital approach. These surgeries were also performed by one surgeon. The 2 groups were matched for size and location of meningiomas. We compared the extent of surgery, frequency of complications, severity of cosmetic defects, and other parameters between the groups. Preoperative examination, microsurgical removal of the tumor, anesthesia, and postoperative management were the same in both groups.
Results. We observed no differences in the extent of surgery, frequency of complaints, complications, and neurological status between participants in the experimental and control groups. There were no deaths in either group. Patients that underwent surgery via the transciliary supraorbital approach had lower blood loss than those who underwent surgery via the lateral supraorbital approach (145 ± 18 mL vs 186 ± 24 mL). The duration of surgery was also lower in the experimental group than in the control group (145 ± 24 min vs 167 ± 32 min). Cosmetic outcomes were evaluated using the Cosmetic Visual Analogue Scale. Participants in the experimental group had higher score (>90) than controls (2 patients reported scores of 70 and 80). Possible negative effects of the transciliary supraorbital approach include the risk of scarring in the eyebrow area, skin numbness in the frontal area, paralysis of the frontalis muscle, and the need for more accurate preoperative markings using neuronavigation.
Conclusion. In general, the therapeutic effect of surgeries via the transciliary supraorbital and lateral supraorbital approaches do not differ. However, the use of the transciliary supraorbital approach allowed smaller incisions (in both skin and dura mater) and smaller trepanation holes (and as a result minimal displacement of brain structures during surgery). It also ensured lower blood loss and duration of surgery and improved the cosmetic effect. The decision on the surgical approach should be based on tumor characteristics with the consideration of patient’s opinion.

About the Authors

N. S. Puzakov
I.P. Pavlov First St. Petersburg State Medical University, Ministry of Health of Russia; S.M. Kirov Military Medical Academy, Ministry of Defense of Russia
Russian Federation

6–8 L’va Tolstogo St., Saint Petersburg 197022;

6 Lebedeva St., Saint Petersburg 194044



V. Yu. Cherebillo
I.P. Pavlov First St. Petersburg State Medical University, Ministry of Health of Russia; S.M. Kirov Military Medical Academy, Ministry of Defense of Russia; V.A. Almazov National Medical Research Center, Ministry of Health of Russia
Russian Federation

6–8 L’va Tolstogo St., Saint Petersburg 197022;

6 Lebedeva St., Saint Petersburg 194044;

12 Mayakovsky St., Saint Petersburg 191014



A. V. Polezhaev
S.M. Kirov Military Medical Academy, Ministry of Defense of Russia
Russian Federation
6 Lebedeva St., Saint Petersburg 194044


G. V. Gavrilov
I.P. Pavlov First St. Petersburg State Medical University, Ministry of Health of Russia; S.M. Kirov Military Medical Academy, Ministry of Defense of Russia; V.A. Almazov National Medical Research Center, Ministry of Health of Russia
Russian Federation

6–8 L’va Tolstogo St., Saint Petersburg 197022;

6 Lebedeva St., Saint Petersburg 194044;

12 Mayakovsky St., Saint Petersburg 191014



P. V. Ognev
I.P. Pavlov First St. Petersburg State Medical University, Ministry of Health of Russia; I.I. Dzhanelidze Saint Petersburg Research Institute of Emergence Medicine
Russian Federation

6–8 L’va Tolstogo St., Saint Petersburg 197022;

3 Budapeshtskaya St., Saint Petersburg 192242



M. Yu. Kurnukhina
I.P. Pavlov First St. Petersburg State Medical University, Ministry of Health of Russia
Russian Federation
6–8 L’va Tolstogo St., Saint Petersburg 197022


References

1. Гайдар Б.В., Парфенов В.Е., Кондаков Е.Н. и др. Классификация оперативных доступов к структурам черепа и головного мозга. Нейрохирургия 2011;(4):16–22. [Gaidar B.V., Parfenov V.E., Kondakov E.N. et al. Classification of surgical approaches to skull and brain structures. Neyrokhirurgiya = Russian Journal of Neurosurgery 2011;(4):16–22. (In Russ.)].

2. Гайдар Б.В., Парфенов В.Е., Гуляев Д.А. и др. Оперативные доступы в хирургии черепа и головного мозга. Вестник Российской военно-медицинской академии 2011;(2):210–3. [Gaidar B.V., Parfenov V.E., Guljaev D.A. et al. Approaches in the scull and brain surgery. Vestnik Rossiyskoy voenno-meditsinskoy akademii = Bulletin of the Russian Military Medical Academy 2011;(2):210–3. (In Russ.)].

3. Джинджихадзе Р.С., Древаль О.Н., Лазарев В.А. и др. Супраорбитальная краниотомия с использованием keyhole доступов в хирургии внутри- и внемозговых опухолей. Опухоли головы и шеи 2017;7(3):31–8. [Dzhindzhikhadze R.S., Dreval O.N., Lazarev V.A. et al. Supraorbital keyhole craniotomy in surgery of intra- and extra-axial brain tumors. Opukholi golovy i shei = Head and Neck Tumors 2017;(3):31–8. (In Russ.)]. DOI: 10.17650/2222-1468-2017-7-3-31-38.

4. Wilson D.H. Limited exposure in cerebral surgery. Technical note. J neurosurg 1971;34(1):102–6. DOI: 10.3171/jns.1971.34.1.0102.

5. Reisch R., Perneczky A. Ten-year experience with the supraorbital subfrontal approach through an eyebrow skin incision. Neurosurgery 2005;57(4 Suppl): 242–55.

6. Perneczky A., Reusch R. Keyhole approaches in neurosurgery. Vol. 1. Concept and surgical technique. Wien: Springer, 2008. 301 p. Алексеев А.Г.,

7. Джинджихадзе Р.С., Древаль О.Н., Лазарев В.А., Камбиев Р.Л. Супраорбитальная “keyhole” краниотомия в хирургии аневризм переднего отдела виллизиева круга. Журнал «Вопросы нейрохирургии им. Н.Н. Бурденко» 2016;80(5):78–84. [Dzhindzhikhadze R.S., Dreval O.N., Lazarev V.A., Kambiev R.L. Supraorbital keyhole craniotomy in surgery of anterior circle of Willis aneurysms. Zhurnal “Voprosy neirokhirurgii im. N.N. Burdenko” = Problems of Neurosurgery n. a. N.N. Burdenko 2016;80(5):78–84. (In Russ.)]. DOI: 10.17116/neiro201680578-84.

8. Алексеев А.Г., Пичугин А.А., Шаяхметов Н.Г. и др. Чрезбровная (трансцилиарная) супраорбитальная краниотомия по типу “keyhole” в хирургии опухолей передней черепной ямки и аневризм передней циркуляции виллизиева круга: первый опыт нейрохирургического отделения. Российский нейрохирургический журнал им. А.Л. Поленова 2014;6(2):15–21. [Alekseev A.G., Pichugin A.A., Shayahmetov N.G. et al. Trans-ciliary supraorbital “keyhole” type craniotomy in the surgery of tumors of precranial fossa and aneurysms of Willis’ artery anterior circulation: the first experience of the neurosurgical department. Rossiyskiy neyrokhirurgicheskiy zhurnal im. A.L. Polenova = Russian Neurosurgical Journal n. a. A.L. Polenov 2014;6(2):15–21. (In Russ.)].

9. Пичугин А.А. Сравнительная оценка эффективности и безопасности супраорбитального трансбровного и птерионального доступов в хирургии аневризм передней циркуляции виллизиева круга и опухолей передней черепной ямки. Автореф. дис. … канд. мед. наук. Казань, 2018. 25 с. Доступ по: http:// www.almazovcentre.ru/wp-content/uploads/%D0%90%D0%B2%D1%82%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%B5%D1%84%D0%B5%D1%80%D0%B0%D1%826.pdf. [Pichugin A.A. Comparative evaluation of efficacy and safety of the supraorbital transciliary and pterional approaches in surgery of aneurysms of Willis’ artery anterior circulation and tumors of the anterior cranial fossa. Abstract of dis. … of cand. of med. sciences. Kazan, 2018. 25 p. Available at: http://www.almazovcentre.ru/wpcontent/uploads/%D0%90%D0%B2%D1%82%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%B5%D1%84%D0%B5%D1%80%D0%B0%D1%826.pdf. (In Russ.)].


Review

For citations:


Puzakov N.S., Cherebillo V.Yu., Polezhaev A.V., Gavrilov G.V., Ognev P.V., Kurnukhina M.Yu. REMOVAL OF SUPRASELLAR MENINGIOMAS VIA THE TRANSCILIARY SUPRAORBITAL APPROACH. Russian journal of neurosurgery. 2019;21(2):21-27. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17650/1683-3295-2019-21-2-21-27

Views: 883


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1683-3295 (Print)
ISSN 2587-7569 (Online)
X