Preview

Russian journal of neurosurgery

Advanced search

Evaluation of accuracy of medical optical navigation system “Neuroplan” for modeling of neurosurgical interventions

https://doi.org/10.17650/1683-3295-2018-20-4-104-113

Abstract

This study is devoted to the accuracy of the optic navigation system “Neuroplan”. To assess the complex error of the system, a plastic model of the skull with 8 radiocontrast target points was developed. Twelve neurosurgeons with different levels of training participated in the study. The design of the study provided for each doctor performance of registration in the “Neuroplan” system at various positions of the model with subsequent hit at the target points. To select the optimal method of registration for different patient positions on the operating table, the registration table for anatomical landmarks (from 3 to 7) and on the surface was used. The analysis of the obtained results showed a high accuracy of the optic navigation system “Neuroplan”: in the side position of the scull model the target error averaged 1.57 [1.11; 2.13] mm, in the face down position – 1.69 [1.26; 2.19] mm, which is comparable with the declared accuracy of foreign analogues. When the experiment was repeated, it was shown that the system has high retest reliability.

About the Authors

I. V. Arhipov
Gammamed-Soft, Ltd
Russian Federation
Build. 1, 16 Krasnoproletarskaya St., Moscow 127473


E. M. Mikhaylov
Gammamed-Impex, Ltd
Russian Federation
Build. 2, 4 Oktyabrskaya St., Moscow 127018


D. D. Dolotova
Gammamed-Soft, Ltd
Russian Federation
Build. 1, 16 Krasnoproletarskaya St., Moscow 127473


D. E. Zakondyrin
A.I. Evdokimov Moscow State University of Medicine and Dentistry, Ministry of Health of Russia
Russian Federation

Clinical Medical Center 

Build. 4, 1a Kuskovskaya St., Moscow 4111398, 



A. V. Gavrilov
Lomonosov Moscow State University
Russian Federation

Laboratory of Medical Computing System, D.V. Skobeltsyn Institute of nuclear physics 

Build. 58, 1 Leninskie Gory, Moscow 119991



A. I. Leychenko
Gammamed-Soft, Ltd
Russian Federation
Build. 1, 16 Krasnoproletarskaya St., Moscow 127473


V. V. Krylov
A.I. Evdokimov Moscow State University of Medicine and Dentistry, Ministry of Health of Russia; N.V. Sklifosovsky Research Institute for Emergency Medicine, Moscow Healthcare Department
Russian Federation
Build. 4, 1a Kuskovskaya St., Moscow 4111398


A. Yu. Dmitriev
N.V. Sklifosovsky Research Institute for Emergency Medicine, Moscow Healthcare Department
Russian Federation
3 Bol’shaya Sukharevskaya Sq., Moscow 129090


References

1. Krylov V.V., Shaklunov A.A., Bulycheva E.R. Different types of landmarks and determining their optimal location for frameless navigation. Neyrokhirurgiya = Russian Journal of Neurosurgery 2009;(2):13–22. (In Russ.).

2. Woerdemann P.A., Willems P.W., Noordmans H.J. Application accuracy in frameless image-guided neurosurgery: a comparison study of three patient-toimage registration methods. J Neurosurg 2007;106(6):1012–6. DOI: 10.3171/jns.2007.106.6.1012. PMID: 17564173.

3. Shamir R.R., Joskowicz L., Spektor S., Shoshan Y. Target and trajectory clinical application accuracy in neuronavigation. Neurosurgery 2011;68(l Suppl Operative): 95–101. DOI: 10.1227/NEU.0b013e31820828d9. PMID: 21206305.

4. Samarakkody Z.M., Abdullah B. The use of image guided navigational tracking systems for endoscopic sinus surgery and skull base surgery: a review. Egyptian J Ear Nose Throat Allied Sci 2016;17(30):133–7. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejenta.2016.07.005.

5. Willems P.W., Berkelbach van der Sprenkel J.W., Tulleken C.A.F. Comparison of adhesive markers, anatomical landmarks, and surface matching in patient-to-image registration for frameless stereotaxy. Biomonit Endosc Tech 2001;4158 (Proceedings of SPIE): 156–63.

6. Schicho K., Figl M., Seemann R. et al. Comparison of laser surface scanning and fiducial marker-based registration in frameless stereotaxy. Technical note. J Neurosurg 2007;106(4):704–9. DOI: 10.3171/jns.2007.106.4.704. PMID: 17432726.

7. Salma A., Makiese O., Sammet S., Amiratti M. Effect of registration mode on neuronavigation precision: an exploration of the role of random error. Comput Aided Surg 2012;17(4):172–8. DOI: 10.3109/10929088.2012.691992. PMID: 22681460.

8. Smith T.R., Mithal D.S., Stadler J.A. et al. Impact of fiducial arrangement and registration sequence on target accuracy using a phantom frameless stereotactic navigation model. J Clin Neurosci 2014;21(11):1976–80. DOI: 10.1016/j.jocn.2014.04.006. PMID: 24957630.

9. Hu X., Lieberman I.H. What is the learning curve for robotic-assisted pedicle screw placement in spine surgery? Clin Orthop Relat Res 2014;472(6):1839– 44. DOI: 10.1007/s11999-013-3291-1. PMID: 24048889.


Review

For citations:


Arhipov I.V., Mikhaylov E.M., Dolotova D.D., Zakondyrin D.E., Gavrilov A.V., Leychenko A.I., Krylov V.V., Dmitriev A.Yu. Evaluation of accuracy of medical optical navigation system “Neuroplan” for modeling of neurosurgical interventions. Russian journal of neurosurgery. 2018;20(4):104-113. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17650/1683-3295-2018-20-4-104-113

Views: 897


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1683-3295 (Print)
ISSN 2587-7569 (Online)
X