Preview

Russian journal of neurosurgery

Advanced search

DEGENERATIVE LATERAL STENOSIS OF LUMBAR VERTEBRAL CANAL

Abstract

The literature review is presented dedicated to the problem of degenerative lateral stenosis of lumbar vertebral canal. The data of pathological anatomy, types and clinical signs of lateral stenosis are presented. The possibilities of current instrumental diagnostics of this pathology described as well as treatment options are discussed. The indications for surgical treatment and various types of surgical interventions are enumerated.

About the Author

A. S. Nikitin
ГБУЗ «ГКБ № 12 ДЗМ».
Russian Federation


References

1. Борщенко И.А., Мигачев С.Л., Басков А.В. Спинальный поясничный дегенеративный стеноз: билатеральная декомпрессия из одностороннего доступа. // Нейрохирургия. — 2011. — № 1. — С. 54—60

2. Гиоев П.М., Давыдов Е.А., Омельченко А.В. Стенозы позвоночного канала на поясничном уровне: типы клинического течения, результаты лечения, оперативная тактика // Нейрохирургия. — 2003. — №3. — С. 22—25.

3. Колотов Е.Б., Аминов Р.Р., Кельмаков В.В., Колотова Е.В., Епифанцев А.Г. Возможности передних декомпрессивностабилизирующих вмешательств в лечении пациентов с комбинированным латеральным стенозом поясничного отдела позвоночника // Нейрохирургия. — 2013. — №1. — С. 40—44.

4. Щедренок В.В., Себелев К.И., Чижова М.В., Иваненко А.В., Могучая О.В. Измерение объема межпозвонковых каналов с помощью спиральной компьютерной томографиипри дегенеративных заболеваниях позвоночника // Хирургия позвоночника. — 2011. — №4. — С.47—50.

5. Ando M., Tamaki T., Kawakami M., Minamide A. et al. Electrophysiological diagnosis using sensory nerve action potential for the intraforaminal and extraforaminal L5 nerve root entrapment // Eur Spine. — 2013. — Vol. 22(4). — P.833—839.

6. Aota Y., Niwa T., Yoshikawa K. et al. Magnetic resonance imaging and magnetic resonance myelography in the presurgical diagnosis of lumbar foraminal stenosis // Spine (Phila Pa 1976). — 2007. — Vol. 32(8). — P. 896—903.

7. Bartynski W., Lin L. Lumbar Root Compression in the Lateral Recess: MR Imaging, Conventional Myelography, and CT Myelography Comparison with Surgical Confirmation // AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. — 2003. — Vol. 24. — P. 348— 360.

8. Botwin K., Gruber R. Lumbar spinal stenosis: anatomy and pathogenesis // Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. — 2013. — Vol. 14 — P. 1—15.

9. Byun W., Kim J., Lee J. Differentiation between symptomatic and asymptomatic extraforaminal stenosis in lumbosacral transitional vertebra: role of three-dimensional magnetic resonance lumbosacral radiculography // Korean J Radiol. — 2012. — Vol. 13(4). — P. 403—411.

10. Celik H., Derincek A., Koksa I. Surgical Treatment of the Spinal Stenosis with an Interspinous Distraction Device: Do We Really Restore the Foraminal Height? // Turkish Neurosurgery. — 2012 . — Vol.22(1). — P. 50—54

11. Davis R., Errico T., Bae H., Auerbach J. Decompression and Coflex interlaminar stabilization compared with decompression and instrumented spinal fusion for spinal stenosis and lowgrade degenerative spondylolisthesis: two-year results from the prospective, randomized, multicenter, Food and Drug Administration Investigational Device Exemption trial // Spine (Phila Pa 1976). — 2013. —Vol.38(18). — P. 1529— 1539.

12. Eguchi Y., Ohtori S., Yamashita M. et al. Clinical applications of diffusion magnetic resonance imaging of the lumbar foraminal nerve root entrapment // Eur Spine J. — 2010. — Vol. 19. — P. 1874—1882.

13. Erbulut D. Biomechanical effect of graded facetectomy on asymmetrical finite element model of the lumbar spine // Turk Neurosurg. — 2014. — Vol. 24(6). — P. 923—928.

14. Fujimori T., Le H., Schairer W. et al. Does Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Have Advantages over Posterolateral Lumbar Fusion for Degenerative Spondylolisthesis? // Global Spine J. — 2015. — Vol. 5(2). — P. 102—109.

15. Fujibayashi S., Neo M., Takemoto M., Ota M., Nakamura T. Paraspinal-approach transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of lumbar foraminal stenosis // J Neurosurg Spine. — 2010. — Vol.13(4). — P. 500—508.

16. Ghai B., Bansal D., Kay J. et al. Transforaminal versus parasagittal interlaminar epidural steroid injection in low back pain with radicular pain: a randomized, double-blind, active-control trial // Pain Physician. — 2014. — Vol. 17. — 277—290.

17. Goldman S. Nocturnal neuropathic pain in diabetic patients may be caused by spinal stenosis // Diabet Med. — 2005. — Vol.22(12). — P. 1763—5.

18. Guigui P., Ulivieri J., Lassale B., Deburge A. Reoperations after surgical treatment of lumbar stenosis // Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot. — 1995. — Vol.81(8). — P. 663—671.

19. Hasegawa T., An H., Haughton V. et al. Lumbar foraminal stenosis: critical heights of the intervertebral discs and foramina // J Bone Joint Surg Am. — 1995. — Vol. 77. — P. 32—38.

20. Hashimoto M., Watanabe O., Hirano H. Extraforaminal ste nosis in the lumbosacral spine. Efficacy of MR imaging in the coronal plane // Acta Radiol. — 1996. — Vol.37(5). — P. 610—613.

21. Hasue M., Kunogi J., Konno S. et al. Classification by position of dorsal root ganglion in the lumbosacral region // Spine. — 1989. — Vol. 14. — P. 1261—1264.

22. Hirabayashi H., Takahashi J., Hashidate H. et al. Characteristics of L3 nerve root radiculopathy // Surg Neurol. — 2009. — Vol.72(1). — P. 36—40.

23. Hobart J., Gilkes C., Adams W., Germon T. Interspinous spacers for lumbar foraminal stenosis: formal trials are justi ed // Eur Spine J. — 2013. — Vol.22(1). — P. 47—53.

24. Holly L., Schwender J., Rouben D., Foley K. Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: indications, technique, and complications // Neurosurg Focus. — 2006. — Vol.20 (3):E6.

25. Hшy K., Bünger C., Niederman B. et al Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) versus posterolateral instrumented fusion (PLF) in degenerative lumbar disorders: a randomized clinical trial with 2-year follow-up // Eur Spine J. — 2013. — Vol.22(9). — P. 2022—2029.

26. Ishimoto Y., Yoshimura N., Muraki S. et al. Associations between radiographic lumbar spinal stenosis and clinical symptoms in the general population: the Wakayama Spine Study // Osteoarthritis and Cartilage. — 2013. — Vol. 21. — P. 783—788.

27. Kim H., Jeong J., Cho H. et al. Comparative observational study of surgical outcomes of lumbar foraminal stenosis using minimally invasive microsurgical extraforaminal decompression alone versus posterior lumbar interbody fusion: a prospective cohort study // Eur Spine J. — 2015. — Vol. 24(2). — P. 388—395.

28. Knight M., Jago I., Norris C. et al. Transforaminal Endoscopic Lumbar Decompression & Foraminoplasty: A 10 Year prospective survivability outcome study of the treatment of foraminal stenosis and failed back surgery // Int J Spine Surg. — 2014. — Vol. 8. — P. 21—25.

29. Koh W., Choi S., Park S. et al. Transforaminal hypertonic saline for the treatment of lumbar lateral canal stenosis: a double-blinded, randomized, active-control trial // Pain Physician. — 2013. — Vol. 16. — P. 197—211.

30. Kuittinen P, Sipola P., Aalto T. et al. Visually assessed severity of lumbar spinal canal stenosis is paradoxically associated with leg pain and objective walking ability // BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. — 2014. — Vol. 15. — P. 348.

31. Kumar N., Shah S., Hong Y., et al. Role of Coflex as an Adjunct to Decompression for Symptomatic Lumbar Spinal Stenosis // Asian Spine J. — 2014. — Vol. 8(2) — P. 161—169.

32. Lee C., Rauschning W., Glenn W. Lateral lumbar spinal canal stenosis: classification, pathologic anatomy and surgical decompression //Spine. — 1988. — Vol.12. — P. 313—320.

33. Lee B., Moon S., Lee H., Kim T., Lee S. Prevalence of hip pathology in patients over age 50 with spinal conditions requiring surgery // Indian J Orthop. — 2012. — Vol. 46(3). — P. 291—296.

34. Lee S., Lee J, Yeon J. et al. A practical MRI grading system for lumbar foraminal stenosis // AJR Am J Roentgenol. — 2010. — Vol. 194. — P. 1095—1098.

35. Liu X., Wang Y., Qiu G., Weng X., Yu B. A systematic review with meta-analysis of posterior interbody fusion versus posterolateral fusion in lumbar spondylolisthesis // Eur Spine J. — 2014. — Vol. 23. — P. 43—56.

36. Liu X., Wang Y., Qiu G., Weng X., Yu B. Meta-analysis of circumferential fusion versus posterolateral fusion in lumbar spondylolisthesis // J Spinal Disord Tech. — 2014. — Vol.27(8). — P.282—293.

37. Matsumoto M., Watanabe K., Ishii K. et al. Posterior decompression surgery for extraforaminal entrapment of the fifth lumbar spinal nerve at the lumbosacral junction // J Neurosurg Spine. — 2010. — Vol. 12. — P. 72—81.

38. Merckaert S., Pierzchala K., Kulik G., Schizas C. Influence of anatomical variations on lumbar foraminal stenosis pathog enesis // Eur Spine J. — 2014. — Aug.

39. Mobbs R., Li J., Sivabalan P., Raley D., Rao P. Outcomes after decompressive laminectomy for lumbar spinal stenosis: comparison between minimally invasive unilateral laminectomy for bilateral decompression and open laminectomy //J Neurosurg Spine. — 2014. — Vol. 21. — P. 179—186.

40. Nakao S., Yoshida M., Yamada H., Hashizume H. A new 3-dimensional computed tomography imaging method to dia gnose extraforaminalstenosis at the lumbosacral junction // J Spinal Disord Tech. — 2010. — Vol. 23(8). — P. 47—52.

41. Oertel J., Mondorf Y., Gaab M. A new endoscopic spine system: the firsy results with «Easy GO»// Acta Neurochir (Wein). — 2009. — Vol.151(9). — P.1027—1033.

42. Ohtori S., Yamashita M., Murata Y. Incidence of nocturnal leg cramps in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis before and after conservative and surgical treatment // Yonsei Med J. — 2014. — Vol.55(3). — P. 779—784.

43. Otani K., Kikuchi S., Yabuki S. et al. Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Has a Negative Impact on Quality of Life Compared with Other Comorbidities: An Epidemiological Cross-Sectional Study of 1862 Community-Dwelling Individuals // Scientific World Journal. — 2013. — 590652.

44. Papavero L., Thiel M., Fritzsche E. et al. Lumbar spinal stenosis: prognostic factors for bilateral microsurgical decompression using a unilateral approach // Neurosurgery. — 2009. — Vol. 65(6). — P. 182—187.

45. Park Y., Kim J., Chung H, Suh J. Microsurgical midline approach for the decompression of extraforaminal stenosis in L5—S1 // J Neurosurg. — 2003. — Vol. 98(3). — P. 264—70.

46. Park H., Kim S., Lee S. et al. Clinical Correlation of a New MR Imaging Method for Assessing Lumbar Foraminal Stenosis // AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. — Vol. 33. — P. 818— 822.

47. Penning L, Wilmink J. Posture-dependent bilateral compression of L4 or L5 nerve roots in facet hypertrophy // Spine. — 1987. — Vol.12. — P. 488—500.

48. Resnick D., Watters W., Sharan A. et al. Guideline update for the performance of fusion procedures for degenerative disease of the lumbar spine. Part 9: Lumbar fusion for stenosis with spondylolisthesis // J Neurosurg Spine. — 2014. — Vol.21. — P. 54—61.

49. Richter A., Schutz C., Hauck M., Halm H. Does an interspinous device (CoflexTM) improve the outcome of decompressive surgery in lumbar spinal stenosis? One-year follow up of a prospective case control study of 60 patients // Eur Spine J. — 2010. — Vol.19. — P. 283—289.

50. Ruetten S., Komp M., Merk H., Godolias G. Surgical treatment for lumbar lateral recess stenosis with the full-endoscopic interlaminar approach versus conventional microsurgical technique: a prospective, randomized, controlled study // J Neurosurg Spine. — 2009. — Vol.10(5). — P. 476—485.

51. Sanderson P., Getty C. Long-term results of partial undercutting facetectomy for lumbar lateral recess stenosis // Spine (Phila Pa 1976). — 1996. — Vol,21(11). — P.1352— 1356.

52. Saito J., Ohtori S., Kishida S. et al. Difficulty of diagnosing the origin of lower leg pain in patients with both lumbar spinal stenosis and hip joint osteoarthritis // Spine (Phila Pa 1976). — 2012. — Vol.37(25). — P. 2089—2093.

53. Schofferman J., Reynolds J., Herzog R. et al. Failed back surgery: etiology and diagnostic evaluation // Spine J. — 2003. — Vol.3(5). — P. 400—403.

54. Steurer J., Roner S., Gnannt R., Hodler J. Quantitative radiologic criteria for the diagnosis of lumbar spinal stenosis: a systematic literature review // BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. — 2011. — Vol. 12. — P. 175—182.

55. Strojnik T. Measurement of the lateral recess angle as a possible alternative for evaluation of the lateral recess stenosis on a CT scan // Wien Klin Wochenschr. — 2001. — 113(3). — P. 53—58.

56. Transfeldt E., Robertson D., Bradford D. Ligaments of the lumbosacral spine and their role in possible extraforaminal spinal nerve entrapment and tethering // J Spinal Disord. — 1993. — Vol. 6. — P. 507—512.

57. Waguespack A., Schofferman J., Slosar P. Etiology of longterm failures of lumbar spine surgery // Pain Med. — 2002. — Vol.3(1). — P. 18—22.

58. Yamada K., Aota Y., Higashi T. et al. Lumbar foraminal sten osis causes leg pain at rest // Eur Spine J. — 2014. — Vol. 23(3). — P. 504—507.


Review

For citations:


Nikitin A.S. DEGENERATIVE LATERAL STENOSIS OF LUMBAR VERTEBRAL CANAL. Russian journal of neurosurgery. 2016;(1):85-92. (In Russ.)

Views: 5772


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1683-3295 (Print)
ISSN 2587-7569 (Online)
X