ДЕГЕНЕРАТИВНЫЙ ЛАТЕРАЛЬНЫЙ СТЕНОЗ ПОЗВОНОЧНОГО КАНАЛА НА ПОЯСНИЧНОМ УРОВНЕ
Аннотация
Представлен обзор современной литературы, посвященный проблеме дегенеративного латерального стеноза позвоночного канала на поясничном уровне. Приведены данные о патологической анатомии, формах и клинических проявлениях латерального стеноза. Описаны возможности современной инструментальной диагностики заболевания. Рассмотрены вопросы лечения латерального стеноза. Приведены показания к операции и представлены различные варианты хирургического лечения.
Об авторе
А. С. Никитин
ГБУЗ «ГКБ № 12 ДЗМ».
Россия
Россия
Никитин Андрей Сергеевич — к.м.н., врач-нейрохирург отделения нейрохирургии ГБУЗ «ГКБ №12 ДЗМ».
Москва.
Список литературы
1. Борщенко И.А., Мигачев С.Л., Басков А.В. Спинальный поясничный дегенеративный стеноз: билатеральная декомпрессия из одностороннего доступа. // Нейрохирургия. — 2011. — № 1. — С. 54—60
2. Гиоев П.М., Давыдов Е.А., Омельченко А.В. Стенозы позвоночного канала на поясничном уровне: типы клинического течения, результаты лечения, оперативная тактика // Нейрохирургия. — 2003. — №3. — С. 22—25.
3. Колотов Е.Б., Аминов Р.Р., Кельмаков В.В., Колотова Е.В., Епифанцев А.Г. Возможности передних декомпрессивностабилизирующих вмешательств в лечении пациентов с комбинированным латеральным стенозом поясничного отдела позвоночника // Нейрохирургия. — 2013. — №1. — С. 40—44.
4. Щедренок В.В., Себелев К.И., Чижова М.В., Иваненко А.В., Могучая О.В. Измерение объема межпозвонковых каналов с помощью спиральной компьютерной томографиипри дегенеративных заболеваниях позвоночника // Хирургия позвоночника. — 2011. — №4. — С.47—50.
5. Ando M., Tamaki T., Kawakami M., Minamide A. et al. Electrophysiological diagnosis using sensory nerve action potential for the intraforaminal and extraforaminal L5 nerve root entrapment // Eur Spine. — 2013. — Vol. 22(4). — P.833—839.
6. Aota Y., Niwa T., Yoshikawa K. et al. Magnetic resonance imaging and magnetic resonance myelography in the presurgical diagnosis of lumbar foraminal stenosis // Spine (Phila Pa 1976). — 2007. — Vol. 32(8). — P. 896—903.
7. Bartynski W., Lin L. Lumbar Root Compression in the Lateral Recess: MR Imaging, Conventional Myelography, and CT Myelography Comparison with Surgical Confirmation // AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. — 2003. — Vol. 24. — P. 348— 360.
8. Botwin K., Gruber R. Lumbar spinal stenosis: anatomy and pathogenesis // Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. — 2013. — Vol. 14 — P. 1—15.
9. Byun W., Kim J., Lee J. Differentiation between symptomatic and asymptomatic extraforaminal stenosis in lumbosacral transitional vertebra: role of three-dimensional magnetic resonance lumbosacral radiculography // Korean J Radiol. — 2012. — Vol. 13(4). — P. 403—411.
10. Celik H., Derincek A., Koksa I. Surgical Treatment of the Spinal Stenosis with an Interspinous Distraction Device: Do We Really Restore the Foraminal Height? // Turkish Neurosurgery. — 2012 . — Vol.22(1). — P. 50—54
11. Davis R., Errico T., Bae H., Auerbach J. Decompression and Coflex interlaminar stabilization compared with decompression and instrumented spinal fusion for spinal stenosis and lowgrade degenerative spondylolisthesis: two-year results from the prospective, randomized, multicenter, Food and Drug Administration Investigational Device Exemption trial // Spine (Phila Pa 1976). — 2013. —Vol.38(18). — P. 1529— 1539.
12. Eguchi Y., Ohtori S., Yamashita M. et al. Clinical applications of diffusion magnetic resonance imaging of the lumbar foraminal nerve root entrapment // Eur Spine J. — 2010. — Vol. 19. — P. 1874—1882.
13. Erbulut D. Biomechanical effect of graded facetectomy on asymmetrical finite element model of the lumbar spine // Turk Neurosurg. — 2014. — Vol. 24(6). — P. 923—928.
14. Fujimori T., Le H., Schairer W. et al. Does Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Have Advantages over Posterolateral Lumbar Fusion for Degenerative Spondylolisthesis? // Global Spine J. — 2015. — Vol. 5(2). — P. 102—109.
15. Fujibayashi S., Neo M., Takemoto M., Ota M., Nakamura T. Paraspinal-approach transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of lumbar foraminal stenosis // J Neurosurg Spine. — 2010. — Vol.13(4). — P. 500—508.
16. Ghai B., Bansal D., Kay J. et al. Transforaminal versus parasagittal interlaminar epidural steroid injection in low back pain with radicular pain: a randomized, double-blind, active-control trial // Pain Physician. — 2014. — Vol. 17. — 277—290.
17. Goldman S. Nocturnal neuropathic pain in diabetic patients may be caused by spinal stenosis // Diabet Med. — 2005. — Vol.22(12). — P. 1763—5.
18. Guigui P., Ulivieri J., Lassale B., Deburge A. Reoperations after surgical treatment of lumbar stenosis // Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot. — 1995. — Vol.81(8). — P. 663—671.
19. Hasegawa T., An H., Haughton V. et al. Lumbar foraminal stenosis: critical heights of the intervertebral discs and foramina // J Bone Joint Surg Am. — 1995. — Vol. 77. — P. 32—38.
20. Hashimoto M., Watanabe O., Hirano H. Extraforaminal ste nosis in the lumbosacral spine. Efficacy of MR imaging in the coronal plane // Acta Radiol. — 1996. — Vol.37(5). — P. 610—613.
21. Hasue M., Kunogi J., Konno S. et al. Classification by position of dorsal root ganglion in the lumbosacral region // Spine. — 1989. — Vol. 14. — P. 1261—1264.
22. Hirabayashi H., Takahashi J., Hashidate H. et al. Characteristics of L3 nerve root radiculopathy // Surg Neurol. — 2009. — Vol.72(1). — P. 36—40.
23. Hobart J., Gilkes C., Adams W., Germon T. Interspinous spacers for lumbar foraminal stenosis: formal trials are justi ed // Eur Spine J. — 2013. — Vol.22(1). — P. 47—53.
24. Holly L., Schwender J., Rouben D., Foley K. Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: indications, technique, and complications // Neurosurg Focus. — 2006. — Vol.20 (3):E6.
25. Hшy K., Bünger C., Niederman B. et al Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) versus posterolateral instrumented fusion (PLF) in degenerative lumbar disorders: a randomized clinical trial with 2-year follow-up // Eur Spine J. — 2013. — Vol.22(9). — P. 2022—2029.
26. Ishimoto Y., Yoshimura N., Muraki S. et al. Associations between radiographic lumbar spinal stenosis and clinical symptoms in the general population: the Wakayama Spine Study // Osteoarthritis and Cartilage. — 2013. — Vol. 21. — P. 783—788.
27. Kim H., Jeong J., Cho H. et al. Comparative observational study of surgical outcomes of lumbar foraminal stenosis using minimally invasive microsurgical extraforaminal decompression alone versus posterior lumbar interbody fusion: a prospective cohort study // Eur Spine J. — 2015. — Vol. 24(2). — P. 388—395.
28. Knight M., Jago I., Norris C. et al. Transforaminal Endoscopic Lumbar Decompression & Foraminoplasty: A 10 Year prospective survivability outcome study of the treatment of foraminal stenosis and failed back surgery // Int J Spine Surg. — 2014. — Vol. 8. — P. 21—25.
29. Koh W., Choi S., Park S. et al. Transforaminal hypertonic saline for the treatment of lumbar lateral canal stenosis: a double-blinded, randomized, active-control trial // Pain Physician. — 2013. — Vol. 16. — P. 197—211.
30. Kuittinen P, Sipola P., Aalto T. et al. Visually assessed severity of lumbar spinal canal stenosis is paradoxically associated with leg pain and objective walking ability // BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. — 2014. — Vol. 15. — P. 348.
31. Kumar N., Shah S., Hong Y., et al. Role of Coflex as an Adjunct to Decompression for Symptomatic Lumbar Spinal Stenosis // Asian Spine J. — 2014. — Vol. 8(2) — P. 161—169.
32. Lee C., Rauschning W., Glenn W. Lateral lumbar spinal canal stenosis: classification, pathologic anatomy and surgical decompression //Spine. — 1988. — Vol.12. — P. 313—320.
33. Lee B., Moon S., Lee H., Kim T., Lee S. Prevalence of hip pathology in patients over age 50 with spinal conditions requiring surgery // Indian J Orthop. — 2012. — Vol. 46(3). — P. 291—296.
34. Lee S., Lee J, Yeon J. et al. A practical MRI grading system for lumbar foraminal stenosis // AJR Am J Roentgenol. — 2010. — Vol. 194. — P. 1095—1098.
35. Liu X., Wang Y., Qiu G., Weng X., Yu B. A systematic review with meta-analysis of posterior interbody fusion versus posterolateral fusion in lumbar spondylolisthesis // Eur Spine J. — 2014. — Vol. 23. — P. 43—56.
36. Liu X., Wang Y., Qiu G., Weng X., Yu B. Meta-analysis of circumferential fusion versus posterolateral fusion in lumbar spondylolisthesis // J Spinal Disord Tech. — 2014. — Vol.27(8). — P.282—293.
37. Matsumoto M., Watanabe K., Ishii K. et al. Posterior decompression surgery for extraforaminal entrapment of the fifth lumbar spinal nerve at the lumbosacral junction // J Neurosurg Spine. — 2010. — Vol. 12. — P. 72—81.
38. Merckaert S., Pierzchala K., Kulik G., Schizas C. Influence of anatomical variations on lumbar foraminal stenosis pathog enesis // Eur Spine J. — 2014. — Aug.
39. Mobbs R., Li J., Sivabalan P., Raley D., Rao P. Outcomes after decompressive laminectomy for lumbar spinal stenosis: comparison between minimally invasive unilateral laminectomy for bilateral decompression and open laminectomy //J Neurosurg Spine. — 2014. — Vol. 21. — P. 179—186.
40. Nakao S., Yoshida M., Yamada H., Hashizume H. A new 3-dimensional computed tomography imaging method to dia gnose extraforaminalstenosis at the lumbosacral junction // J Spinal Disord Tech. — 2010. — Vol. 23(8). — P. 47—52.
41. Oertel J., Mondorf Y., Gaab M. A new endoscopic spine system: the firsy results with «Easy GO»// Acta Neurochir (Wein). — 2009. — Vol.151(9). — P.1027—1033.
42. Ohtori S., Yamashita M., Murata Y. Incidence of nocturnal leg cramps in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis before and after conservative and surgical treatment // Yonsei Med J. — 2014. — Vol.55(3). — P. 779—784.
43. Otani K., Kikuchi S., Yabuki S. et al. Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Has a Negative Impact on Quality of Life Compared with Other Comorbidities: An Epidemiological Cross-Sectional Study of 1862 Community-Dwelling Individuals // Scientific World Journal. — 2013. — 590652.
44. Papavero L., Thiel M., Fritzsche E. et al. Lumbar spinal stenosis: prognostic factors for bilateral microsurgical decompression using a unilateral approach // Neurosurgery. — 2009. — Vol. 65(6). — P. 182—187.
45. Park Y., Kim J., Chung H, Suh J. Microsurgical midline approach for the decompression of extraforaminal stenosis in L5—S1 // J Neurosurg. — 2003. — Vol. 98(3). — P. 264—70.
46. Park H., Kim S., Lee S. et al. Clinical Correlation of a New MR Imaging Method for Assessing Lumbar Foraminal Stenosis // AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. — Vol. 33. — P. 818— 822.
47. Penning L, Wilmink J. Posture-dependent bilateral compression of L4 or L5 nerve roots in facet hypertrophy // Spine. — 1987. — Vol.12. — P. 488—500.
48. Resnick D., Watters W., Sharan A. et al. Guideline update for the performance of fusion procedures for degenerative disease of the lumbar spine. Part 9: Lumbar fusion for stenosis with spondylolisthesis // J Neurosurg Spine. — 2014. — Vol.21. — P. 54—61.
49. Richter A., Schutz C., Hauck M., Halm H. Does an interspinous device (CoflexTM) improve the outcome of decompressive surgery in lumbar spinal stenosis? One-year follow up of a prospective case control study of 60 patients // Eur Spine J. — 2010. — Vol.19. — P. 283—289.
50. Ruetten S., Komp M., Merk H., Godolias G. Surgical treatment for lumbar lateral recess stenosis with the full-endoscopic interlaminar approach versus conventional microsurgical technique: a prospective, randomized, controlled study // J Neurosurg Spine. — 2009. — Vol.10(5). — P. 476—485.
51. Sanderson P., Getty C. Long-term results of partial undercutting facetectomy for lumbar lateral recess stenosis // Spine (Phila Pa 1976). — 1996. — Vol,21(11). — P.1352— 1356.
52. Saito J., Ohtori S., Kishida S. et al. Difficulty of diagnosing the origin of lower leg pain in patients with both lumbar spinal stenosis and hip joint osteoarthritis // Spine (Phila Pa 1976). — 2012. — Vol.37(25). — P. 2089—2093.
53. Schofferman J., Reynolds J., Herzog R. et al. Failed back surgery: etiology and diagnostic evaluation // Spine J. — 2003. — Vol.3(5). — P. 400—403.
54. Steurer J., Roner S., Gnannt R., Hodler J. Quantitative radiologic criteria for the diagnosis of lumbar spinal stenosis: a systematic literature review // BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. — 2011. — Vol. 12. — P. 175—182.
55. Strojnik T. Measurement of the lateral recess angle as a possible alternative for evaluation of the lateral recess stenosis on a CT scan // Wien Klin Wochenschr. — 2001. — 113(3). — P. 53—58.
56. Transfeldt E., Robertson D., Bradford D. Ligaments of the lumbosacral spine and their role in possible extraforaminal spinal nerve entrapment and tethering // J Spinal Disord. — 1993. — Vol. 6. — P. 507—512.
57. Waguespack A., Schofferman J., Slosar P. Etiology of longterm failures of lumbar spine surgery // Pain Med. — 2002. — Vol.3(1). — P. 18—22.
58. Yamada K., Aota Y., Higashi T. et al. Lumbar foraminal sten osis causes leg pain at rest // Eur Spine J. — 2014. — Vol. 23(3). — P. 504—507.
Рецензия
Для цитирования:
Никитин А.С. ДЕГЕНЕРАТИВНЫЙ ЛАТЕРАЛЬНЫЙ СТЕНОЗ ПОЗВОНОЧНОГО КАНАЛА НА ПОЯСНИЧНОМ УРОВНЕ. Нейрохирургия. 2016;(1):85-92.
For citation:
Nikitin A.S. DEGENERATIVE LATERAL STENOSIS OF LUMBAR VERTEBRAL CANAL. Russian journal of neurosurgery. 2016;(1):85-92. (In Russ.)
Просмотров: 5210
Послать статью по эл. почте 
