Preview

Russian journal of neurosurgery

Advanced search

Timing of surgery as outcome predictor in brachial plexus injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis

https://doi.org/10.63769/1683-3295-2026-28-2-88-97

Abstract

Objectives. To evaluate the evidence of timing of surgery in Brachial plexus injury and neurological outcome.

Data sources. The search included PubMed (until November 2022); Scopus (until March 2023); Central Cochrane Registry of Controlled Trials (The Cochrane Library) (until March 2023); MEDLINE (Ovid) until 2023; November EMBASE (Ovid); CINAHL (until March 2023). Study selection. All articles that reported assessment timing of surgery in Brachial Plexus Injury (BPI), poor neurological and functional outcome.

Data extraction. Study type, publication year, number of patients, level of lesion, preoperatory assessment, delayed of operation, operative management, follow up. We performed a meta-analysis for each variable which there was important data to estimate the importance of surgical time in the management of BPI.

Data synthesis. 21 studies were included in the studies, which included collected data on 878 patients from retrospective and prospective observational studies. The analysis combined odds ratios, showing an overall effect of 3.1 (95 % confidence intervals 2.2–4.3), indicating that early surgery significantly improves neurological outcomes. The low heterogeneity suggests overall consistency across studies. Although studies such as Goubier et al. (2011) and Socolovsky et al. (2011) showed stronger effects, the results indicate that surgery timing plays a crucial role in neurological recovery, with early interventions being more favorable.

Conclusion. There is a solid foundation to support that early surgical intervention in patients with brachial plexus lesions is a more beneficial treatment than late stage interventions. 

About the Authors

N. D. J. L. Villamil
Faculty of Medicine, University of Cartagena
Colombia

Bolívar 



W. A. Flórez-Perdomo
AV Healthcare Innovators, LLC
United States

Madison, Wisconsin 



M. Acosta
Renaissance Health System
United States

Edinburg, Texas 



M. I. Camargo
Faculty of Medicine, University of Cartagena
Colombia

Bolívar 



D. P. A. Pérez
Faculty of Medicine, University of Cartagena
Colombia

Bolívar 



A. Agrawal
Department of Neurosurgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences
India

Saket Nagar 



L. R. Moscote-Salazar
AV Healthcare Innovators, LLC
United States

Madison, Wisconsin



References

1. Midha R. Epidemiology of brachial plexus injuries in a multitrauma population. Neurosurgery 1997;40(6):1182–8; discussion 1188–9. DOI: 10.1097/00006123-199706000-00014

2. Songcharoen P., Mahaisavariya B., Chotigavanich C. Spinal accessory neurotization for restoration of elbow flexion in avulsion injuries of the brachial plexus. J Hand Surg 1996;21(3):387–90. DOI: 10.1016/S0363-5023(96)80349-2

3. Samii M., Carvalho G.A., Nikkhah G., Penkert G. Surgical reconstruction of the musculocutaneous nerve in traumatic brachial plexus injuries. J Neurosurg 1997;87(6):881–6. DOI: 10.3171/jns.1997.87.6.0881

4. Dubuisson A.S., Kline D.G. Brachial plexus injury: a survey of 100 consecutive cases from a single service. Neurosurgery 2002;51(3):673–82; discussion 682–3.

5. Matsuyama T., Okuchi K., Akahane M. et al. Clinical analysis of 16 patients with brachial plexus injury. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 2002;42(3):114–21; discussion 122. DOI: 10.2176/nmc.42.114

6. Teboul F., Kakkar R., Ameur N. et al. Transfer of fascicles from the ulnar nerve to the nerve to the biceps in the treatment of upper brachial plexus palsy. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2004;86(7):1485–90. DOI: 10.2106/00004623-200407000-00018

7. Huang X., You Z., Xiang Y. et al. Posterior division of ipsilateral C7 transfer to  C5 for shoulder abduction limitation. Front Neurol 2023;14:1012977. DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1012977

8. Gao K., Lao J., Zhao X., Gu Y. Outcome after transfer of intercostal nerves to the nerve of triceps long head in 25 adult patients with total brachial plexus root avulsion injury: Clinical article. J Neurosurg 2013;118(3):606–10. DOI: 10.3171/2012.10.JNS12637

9. Xiao C., Lao J., Wang T. Et al. Intercostal nerve transfer to neurotize the musculocutaneous nerve after traumatic brachial plexus avulsion: a comparison of two, three, and four nerve transfers. J Reconstr Microsurg 2014;30(5):297–304. DOI: 10.1055/s-0033-1361840

10. Stewart M.P., Birch R. Penetrating missile injuries of the brachial plexus. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2001;83(4):517–24. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620x.83b4.11583

11. Samii A., Carvalho G.A., Samii M. Brachial plexus injury: factors affecting functional outcome in spinal accessory nerve transfer for the restoration of elbow flexion. J Neurosurg 2003;98(2):307–12. DOI: 10.3171/jns.2003.98.2.0307

12. Dong Z., Zhang C.G., Gu Y.D. Surgical outcome of phrenic nerve transfer to the anterior division of the upper trunk in treating brachial plexus avulsion. J Neurosurg 2010;112(2):383–5. DOI: 10.3171/2009.4.JNS081064

13. Goubier J.N., Teboul F., Khalifa H. Reanimation of elbow extension with intercostal nerves transfers in total brachial plexus palsies. Microsurgery 2011;31(1):7–11. DOI: 10.1002/micr.20822

14. Lin  H., Hou C., Chen A., Xu Z. Transfer of the phrenic nerve to the posterior division of the lower trunk to recover thumb and finger extension in brachial plexus palsy. J Neurosurg 2011;114(1):212–6. DOI: 10.3171/2010.7.JNS091748

15. Ray W.Z., Pet M.A., Yee A., Mackinnon SE.. Double fascicular nerve transfer to the biceps and brachialis muscles after brachial plexus injury: clinical outcomes in a series of 29 cases. J Neurosurg 2011;114(6):1520–8. DOI: 10.3171/2011.1.JNS10810

16. Socolovsky M., Di Masi G., Battaglia D. Use of long autologous nerve grafts in brachial plexus reconstruction: factors that affect the outcome. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2011;153(11):2231–40. DOI: 10.1007/s00701-011-1131-1

17. Barthel P.Y., Barbary S., Breton A. et al. Recovery of elbow flexion in post-traumatic C5-C6 and  C5-C6-C7 palsy: retrospective dualcenter study comparing single and double nerve transfer. Chir Main 2014;33(3):211–8. DOI: 10.1016/j.main.2014.02.002

18. Socolovsky M., Martins R.S., Di Masi G. et al. Influence of body mass index on the outcome of brachial plexus surgery: are there any differences between elbow and shoulder results? Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2014;156(12):2337–44. DOI: 10.1007/s00701-014-2256-9

19. Krauss E.M., Noland S.S., Hill E.J.R. et al. Outcome analysis of medial triceps motor nerve transfer to axillary nerve in isolated and brachial plexus-associated axillary nerve palsy. Plast Reconstr Surg 2022;149(6):1380–90. DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000009148

20. Ren G.h., Li R.g., Xiang D.y., Yu B. Reconstruction of shoulder abduction by multiple nerve fascicle transfer through posterior approach. Injury 2013;44(4):492–7. DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2012.10.024

21. Xu W.D., Gu Y.D., Xu J.G., Tan L.J. Full-length phrenic nerve transfer by means of video-assisted thoracic surgery in treating brachial plexus avulsion injury. Plast Reconstr Surg 2002;110(1):104–9; discussion 110–1.

22. Zyaei A., Saied A. Functional outcome of ulnar nerve fascicle transfer for restoration of elbow flexion in upper brachial plexus injury. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 2010;20(4):293–7.

23. Sokki A.M., Bhat D.I., Devi B.I. Cortical reorganization following neurotization: a diffusion tensor imaging and functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Neurosurgery 2012;70(5):1305–11; discussion 1311. DOI: 10.1227/NEU.0b013e318241017d


Review

For citations:


Villamil N., Flórez-Perdomo W.A., Acosta M., Camargo M.I., Pérez D., Agrawal A., Moscote-Salazar L.R. Timing of surgery as outcome predictor in brachial plexus injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Russian journal of neurosurgery. 2026;28(2):88-97. https://doi.org/10.63769/1683-3295-2026-28-2-88-97

Views: 67

JATS XML


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1683-3295 (Print)
ISSN 2587-7569 (Online)
X