The case of recurrent aneurysm of the middle cerebral artery after reconstructive clipping (clinical case and literature review)
https://doi.org/10.24412/2587-7569-2025-1-75-83
Abstract
The improvement of methods of noninvasive radiation diagnostics, their wide accessibility to the population of developed countries, has made it indisputable that a recurrent course of aneurysmal brain disease is possible, even in cases of radical surgical treatment. The main causes of the progression of aneurysmal disease are considered to be an increase in the size of residual aneurysms, recurrence and formation of de novo aneurysms.
The article describes the case of successful treatment of a 43-year-old female patient with a recurrent aneurysm of the fork of the middle cerebral artery. The issues of dispensary observation of patients with cerebral aneurysms and surgical tactics in cases of progressive course of aneurysmal disease, which remains the subject of scientific discussions to date, are discussed.
Female patient with a ruptured aneurysm of the middle cerebral artery was admitted in serious condition. Reconstructive clipping was performed using 5 clips. Control angiography revealed a recurrence in the cervical part of a small size. After 5 years of stable angiographic picture, an increase in the cervical part was revealed. Repeated surgical treatment was performed – clipping of a recurrent middle cerebral artery aneurysm. In control cerebral angiography, the aneurysm is not contrasted.
The modern concept of treatment of aneurysmal brain disease involves the most radical shutdown of a ruptured aneurysm and all clinically significant intact aneurysms. Surgical tactics in the progressive course of aneurysmal disease remains controversial, is subjective, takes into account the clinical type of the disease, the method of turning off aneurysms and the surgeon’s experience.
Repeated surgical interventions are indicated with the progression of aneurysmal disease accompanied by hemorrhage, in all cases of “true recurrence”, detection of de novo aneurysms.
The optimal method for disabling recurrent and pseudorecidive aneurysms is intravascular embolization of the aneurysm with microspirals, including using assistive technologies or flow-bending devices. Open surgeries should be considered only as an alternative treatment method, due to the high risk of intraoperative complications during the isolation and clipping of aneurysms previously undergoing surgical treatment. The lack of clear data on the timing of recurrence and growth of existing aneurysms requires the development of modality and frequency of control postoperative angiographic examinations.
About the Authors
D. V. LitvinenkoRussian Federation
Dmitry V. Litvinenko.
167 1 Maya St., Krasnodar 350086
A. E. Gerasyuta
Russian Federation
167 1 Maya St., Krasnodar 350086
E. I. Zyablova
Russian Federation
167 1 Maya St., Krasnodar 350086; 4 M. Sedina St., Krasnodar 350063
V. V. Tkachev
Russian Federation
167 1 Maya St., Krasnodar 350086; 4 M. Sedina St., Krasnodar 350063
V. A. Porkhanov
Russian Federation
167 1 Maya St., Krasnodar 350086; 4 M. Sedina St., Krasnodar 350063
References
1. McDougall C.G., Spetzler R.F., Zabramski J.M. et al. The Barrow Ruptured Aneurysm Trial. J Neurosurg 2012;116(1):135–44. DOI: 10.3171/2011.8.JNS101767
2. Sturiale C.L., Scerrati A., Ricciardi L. et al. Clipping versus coiling for treatment of middle cerebral artery aneurysms: a retrospective Italian multicenter experience. Neurosurg Rev 2022;45(5):3179–91. DOI: 10.1007/s10143-022-01822-3
3. Kadkhodayan Y., Delgado Almandoz J.E., Fease J.L. et al. Endovascular treatment of 346 middle cerebral artery aneurysms: results of a 16-year single-center experience. Neurosurgery 2015;76(1):54–60; discussion 60–1. DOI: 10.1227/NEU.0000000000000562
4. Mortimer A.M., Bradley M.D., Mews P. et al. Endovascular treatment of 300 consecutive middle cerebral artery aneurysms: clinical and radiologic outcomes. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2014;35(4):706–14. DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A3776
5. Gaidar B.V., Svistov D.V., Pavlov O.A. et al. Modern paradigm of treatment of aneurysmal brain disease. Meditsinskiy akademcheskiy zhurnal = Medical Academic Journal 2010;10(3):28–36. (In Russ.).
6. Burkhardt J.K., Chua M.H.J., Weiss M. et al. Risk of aneurysm residual regrowth, recurrence, and de novo aneurysm formation after microsurgical clip occlusion based on follow-up with catheter angiography. World Neurosurg 2017;106:74–84. DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2017.06.110
7. Han H.J., Lee W., Kim J. et al. Formation, growth, or rupture of de novo intracranial aneurysms: long-term follow-up study of subarachnoid hemorrhage survivors. Neurosurgery 2021;89(6):1104–11. DOI: 10.1093/neuros/nyab364
8. Sindou M., Acevedo J.C., Turjman F. Aneurysmal remnants after microsurgical clipping: classification and results from a prospective angiographic study (in a consecutive series of 305 operated intracranial aneurysms). Acta Neurochir (Wien) 1998;140(11):1153–9. DOI: 10.1007/s007010050230
9. El-Beltagy M., Muroi C., Roth P. et al. Recurrent intracranial aneurysms after successful neck clipping. World Neurosurg 2010;74(4–5):472–7. DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2010.06.036
10. Spiotta A.M., Hui F., Schuette A., Moskowitz S.I. Patterns of aneurysm recurrence after microsurgical clip obliteration. Neurosurgery 2013;72(1):65–9; discussion 69. DOI: 10.1227/NEU.0b013e318276b46b
11. Kobayashi S., Moroi J., Hikichi K. et al. Treatment of recurrent intracranial aneurysms after neck clipping: novel classification scheme and management strategies. Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown) 2017;13(6):670–8. DOI: 10.1093/ons/opx033
12. Fingerlin T.J., Rychen J., Roethlisberger M. et al. Long-term aneurysm recurrence and de novo aneurysm formation after surgical treatment of unruptured intracranial aneurysms: a cohort study and systematic review. Neurol Res 2020;42(4):338–45. DOI: 10.1080/01616412.2020.1726587
13. Giordan E., Lanzino G., Rangel-Castilla L. et al. Risk of de novo aneurysm formation in patients with a prior diagnosis of ruptured or unruptured aneurysm: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Neurosurg 2018;131(1):14–24. DOI: 10.3171/2018.1.JNS172450
14. Graf C.J., Hamby W.B. Report of a case of cerebral aneurysm in an adult developing apparently de novo. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1964;27(2):153–6. DOI: 10.1136/jnnp.27.2.153
15. Miller C.A., Hill S.A., Hunt W.E. “De novo” aneurysms. A clinical review. Surg Neurol 1985;24(2):173–80. DOI: 10.1016/0090-3019(85)90181-8
16. Maiuri F., Spaziante R., Iaconetta G. et al. “De novo” aneurysm formation: report of two cases. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 1995;97(3):233–8. DOI: 10.1016/0303-8467(95)00035-i
17. Piao J., Luan T., Qu L., Yu J. Intracranial post-clipping residual or recurrent aneurysms: current status and treatment options (review). Med Int (Lond) 2021;1(1):1. DOI: 10.3892/mi.2021.1
18. Wermer M.J., Rinkel G.J., Greebe P. et al. Late recurrence of subarachnoid hemorrhage after treatment for ruptured aneurysms: patient characteristics and outcomes. Neurosurgery 2005;56(2):197–204; discussion 197–204. DOI: 10.1227/01.neu.0000148894.32031.39
19. Kim S.T., Baek J.W., Jin S.C. et al. Coil embolization in patients with recurrent cerebral aneurysms who previously underwent surgical clipping. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2019;40(1):116–21. DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A5909
20. Pilipenko Yu.V., Eliava Sh.Sh., Pronin I.N. et al. Completeness of brain aneurysm exclusion according to CT angiography. Zhurnal Voprosy neyrokhirurgii im. N.N. Burdenko = Burdenko’s Journal of Neurosurgery 2020;84(6):76–85. (In Russ., In Engl.). DOI: 10.17116/neiro20208406176
21. Krylov V.V., Grigorieva E.V. CT angiography of brain aneurysms. Moscow: Print-studio, 2020. 216 p.
22. Rotim K., Raguž M., Rotim A. et al. Late aneurysm relapse after microsurgical treatment of middle cerebral artery aneurysm: a case report and literature review of treatment options. Acta Clin Croat 2020;59(3):532–8. DOI: 10.20471/acc.2020.59.03.19
23. Scheer N., Ghaznawi R. van Walderveen M.A.A. et al. Evaluation of the yield of post-clipping angiography and nationwide current practice. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2019;161(4):783–90. DOI: 10.1007/s00701-019-03834-3
24. Hokari M., Kazumara K., Nakayama N. et al. Treatment of recurrent intracranial aneurysms after clipping: a report
25. of 23 cases and a review of the literature. World Neurosurg 2016;92:434–44. DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2016.05.053
26. Giordan E., Lanzino G., Rangel-Castilla L. et al. Risk of de novo aneurysm formation in patients with a prior diagnosis of ruptured or unruptured aneurysm: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Neurosurg 2018;131(1):14–24. DOI: 10.3171/2018.1.JNS172450
27. Smith T.R., Cote D.J., Dasenbrock H.H. et al. Comparison of the efficacy and safety of endovascular coiling versus microsurgical clipping for unruptured middle cerebral artery aneurysms: a systematic review and meta-analysis. World Neurosurg 2015;84(4):942–53. DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2015.05.073
28. Dornbos D. 3rd, Karras C.L., Wenger N. et al. Pipeline embolization device for recurrence of previously treated aneurysms. Neurosurg Focus 2017;42(6):E8. DOI: 10.3171/2017.3.FOCUS1744
29. Spetzler R.F., McDougall C.G., Zabramski J.M. et al. Ten-year analysis of saccular aneurysms in the Barrow Ruptured Aneurysm Trial. J Neurosurg 2019;132(3):771–6. DOI: 10.3171/2018.8.JNS181846
30. Arnaout O.M., El Ahmadieh T.Y., Zammar S.G. et al. Microsurgical treatment of previously coiled intracranial aneurysms: systematic review of the literature. World Neurosurg 2015;84(2):246–53. DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2015.02.027
Review
For citations:
Litvinenko D.V., Gerasyuta A.E., Zyablova E.I., Tkachev V.V., Porkhanov V.A. The case of recurrent aneurysm of the middle cerebral artery after reconstructive clipping (clinical case and literature review). Russian journal of neurosurgery. 2025;27(1):75-83. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24412/2587-7569-2025-1-75-83