Comparative analysis of treatment results of craniotomy and external closed drain in patients with chronic subdural hematomas
https://doi.org/10.17650/1683-3295-2024-26-3-72-78
Abstract
Aim. To conduct a comparative analysis of the treatment results of the patients with chronic subdural hematoma using two methods: closed external drainage and craniotomy.
Materials and methods. The data of 55 patients with chronic subdural hematoma operated in the I.I. Dzhanelidze St. Petersburg Research Institute of Emergency Medicine from 2019 to mid-2023 was analyses retrospectively. Depending on the treatment method, patients were divided into 2 groups: external subdural drains (n = 30, 55.5 %) and evacuation of hematoma via craniotomy (n = 25, 45.5 %). The patients in the groups were comparable in clinical features, radiological characteristics and the Charlson comorbidity index. In the postoperative period, the following were assessed: hematoma thickness and displacement of median structures, occurrence of surgical complications, and mortality.
Results. There were no differences between the groupsin the midline shift, the frequency of postoperative complications, reoperation and deaths. The thickness of the hematomas according to the control computed tomography scans of the brain was lower in the craniotomy group, but this did not determine the outcome of treatment. Patients with a Charlson Comorbidity Index value of 4 points or higher were significantly more likely to have an unfavorable outcome. The sensitivity and specificity of the index in predicting an unfavorable outcome was 71.4 and 69.7 %, respectively.
Conclusion. There were no differencesin the effectiveness of craniotomy and externalsubdural drains of chronic subdural hematoma. In this regard, it is necessary to give preference to minimally invasive methods of treatment. Assessment of the comorbid status allows predicting an unfavorable outcome of treatment.
About the Authors
E. D. ZykinaRussian Federation
Elizaveta Dmitrievna Zykina
2 Litovskaya St., Saint Petersburg 194100
P. V. Ognev
Russian Federation
3A Budapeshtskaya St., Saint Petersburg 192242
K. N. Babichev
Russian Federation
3A Budapeshtskaya St., Saint Petersburg 192242;
6 Akademika Lebedeva St., Saint Petersburg 194044
M. N. Kravtsov
Russian Federation
3A Budapeshtskaya St., Saint Petersburg 192242;
6 Akademika Lebedeva St., Saint Petersburg 194044;
41 Kirochnaya St., Saint Petersburg 191015
V. E. Parfenov
Russian Federation
3A Budapeshtskaya St., Saint Petersburg 192242
V. A. Manukovskiy
Russian Federation
3A Budapeshtskaya St., Saint Petersburg 192242;
41 Kirochnaya St., Saint Petersburg 191015
References
1. Feghali J., Yang W., Huang J. Updates in chronic subdural hematoma: epidemiology, etiology, pathogenesis, treatment, and outcome. World Neurosurg 2020;141:339–45. DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2020.06.140
2. Karibe H., Kameyama M., Kawase M. et al. [Epidemiology of chronic subdural hematomas (In Japanese)]. No Shinkei Geka 2011;39(12):1149–53.
3. Toi H., Kinoshita K., Hirai S. et al. Present epidemiology of chronic subdural hematoma in Japan: analysis of 63,358 cases recorded in a national administrative database. J Neurosurg 2018;128(1):222–8. DOI: 10.3171/2016.9.JNS16623
4. Balser D., Farooq S., Mehmood T. et al. Actual and projected incidence rates for chronic subdural hematomas in United States Veterans Administration and civilian populations. J Neurosurg 2015;123(5):1209–15. DOI: 10.3171/2014.9.JNS141550
5. De Bonis P., Trevisi G., de Waure C. et al. Antiplatelet/anticoagulant agents and chronic subdural hematoma in the elderly. PLoS One 2013;8(7):e68732. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0068732
6. Charlson M.E., Pompei P., Ales K.L., MacKenzie C.R. A New method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis 1987;40(5):373–83. DOI: 10.1016/0021-9681(87)90171-8
7. Hernández-Durán S., Behme D., Rohde V., von der Brelie C. A matter of frailty: the modified subdural hematoma in the elderly (mSHE) score. Neurosurg Rev 2022;45(1):701–8. DOI: 10.1007/s10143-021-01586-2
8. Likhterman L.B., Kravchuk A.D., Okhlopkov, V.A. Chronic subdural hematomas: challenges and solutions. Part 2. New concept for treatment of chronic subdural hematomas and the results. Klinicheskiy razbor v obshchey meditsine = Clinical Review for General Practice 2021;3:51–7. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.47407/kr2021.2.3.00050
9. Kageyama H., Toyooka T., Tsuzuki N., Oka K. Nonsurgical treatment of chronic subdural hematoma with tranexamic acid. J Neurosurg 2013;119(2);332–7. DOI: 10.3171/2013.3.JNS122162
10. Stanishevskiy A.V., Babichev K.N., Vinogradov E.V. et al. Middle meningeal artery embolization for chronic subdural haematoma. Case series and literature review. Zhurnal voprosy neirokhirurgii im. N.N. Burdenko = Burdenko’s Journal of Neurosurgery 2021;85(5):71–9. (In Russ., in Engl.). DOI: 10.17116/neiro20218505171
11. Kwon C.-S., Al-Awar O., Richards O. et al. Predicting prognosis of patients with chronic subdural hematoma: a new scoring system. World Neurosurg 2018;109:e707–e14. DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2017.10.058
12. Chaliparambil R.K., Nandoliya K.R., Jahromi B.S., Potts M.B. Charlson Comorbidity Index and frailty as predictors of resolution following middle meningeal artery embolization for chronic subdural hematoma. World Neurosurg 2024;183:e877–e85. DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2024.01.049
Review
For citations:
Zykina E.D., Ognev P.V., Babichev K.N., Kravtsov M.N., Parfenov V.E., Manukovskiy V.A. Comparative analysis of treatment results of craniotomy and external closed drain in patients with chronic subdural hematomas. Russian journal of neurosurgery. 2024;26(3):72-78. https://doi.org/10.17650/1683-3295-2024-26-3-72-78