References

neurosurgery

Нейрохирургия

Russian journal of neurosurgery

1683-32952587-7569

Издательский дом "МедИНК"

10.63769/1683-3295-2017-0-1-100-108

neurosurgery-423

Research Article

ОБЗОРЫ ЛИТЕРАТУРЫ

LITERATURE REVIEW

СТЕНОЗ ПОЗВОНОЧНОГО КАНАЛА ПОЯСНИЧНОГО ОТДЕЛА У ПАЦИЕНТОВ ПОЖИЛОГО И СТАРЧЕСКОГО ВОЗРАСТА: СОСТОЯНИЕ ПРОБЛЕМЫ, ОСОБЕННОСТИ ХИРУРГИЧЕСКОГО ЛЕЧЕНИЯ

Lumbar spinal stenosis in elderly and senile patients: problem state and features of surgical treatment

Халепа

Роман Владимирович

Khalepa

R. V.

romkha@mail.ru

Климов

Владимир Сергеевич

Klimov

V. S.

v_klimov@neuronsk.ru

ФГБУ Федеральный центр нейрохирургииRussian Federation

2017

24112017

01100108

2017

Халепа Р.В., Климов В.С.

Khalepa R.V., Klimov V.S.

Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

https://www.therjn.com/jour/article/view/423

Предмет исследования: дегенеративный стеноз позвоночного канала на поясничном уровне у пациентов пожилого и старческого возраста. Цель работы: изучить современное состояние проблемы хирургического лечения у пациентов пожилого и старческого возраста с дегенеративным стенозом позвоночного канала на поясничном уровне. Методы: анализ литературных данных, обсуждение видов дифференцированного оперативного лечения стеноза позвоночного канала на поясничном уровне, рассмотрение причин неудовлетворительных результатов, влияние сопутствующей патологии. Выводы: Общепринятая тактика хирургического лечения спинальных стенозов неприменима к пациентам старшей возрастной группы

The subject of study: degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis in elderly and senile patients Objective: To examine the state of the problem of lumbar spinal stenosis surgery in elderly and senile patients. Material and methods: the analysis of literature data as well as discussion of various differentiated surgical treatment strategies for elderly and senile patients suffered from lumbar spinal stenosis and the review of unsatisfactory results causes as well as influence of comorbidity on treatment outcomes. Results. The basic classification, clinical manifestation and methods of diagnosis as well as differential surgical treatment and causes of unsatisfactory results of lumbar spinal stenosis surgery in elderly patients were discussed. Conclusions: the routine treatment strategy for spinal stenosis surgery is not applicable for the older age patients

стеноз позвоночного каналахирургическое лечениепациенты пожилого и старческого возрастаlumbar spinal stenosissurgical treatmentelderly and senile patients

References1

Borshhenko I.A., Baskov A.V. Surgical treatment of patient with idiopathic lumbar lipomatosis. Nejrohirurgija. 2013; № 3. p. 82-84. (In Russ) (Борщенко И.А., Басков А.В. Хирургическое лечение больного с идиопатическим поясничным эпидуральным липоматозом. Нейрохирургия. 2013; № 3. С. 82-84)

Brjuhanov V.G., Koshkareva Z.V., Sorokovikov V.A., Gorbunov A.V. Diagnostics of spinal lumbar stenosis (literature review). Bjulleten’ VSNC SO RAMN. 2010; 6 (76). Vol. 1. p. 29-31. (In Russ) (Брюханов В.Г., Кошкарева З.В., Сороковиков B.А., Горбунов А.В. Диагностика стенозирующих процессов позвоночного канала на поясничном уровне (обзор литературы). Бюллетень ВСНЦ СО РаМн. 2010; 6 (76). Часть 1. С. 29-31.)

Lucik A.A., Sadovoj M.A., Krut’ko A.V., Epifancev A.G., Bondarenko G.Ju. Degenerative diseases of the spine. Novosibirsk. 2012; (In Russ) (Луцик А.А., Садовой М.А., Крутько А.В., Епифанцев А.Г., Бондаренко Г.Ю. Дегенеративно-дистрофические заболевания позвоночника. Новосибирск. 2012)

Prodan A.I., Perepechaj O.A., Kolesnichenko V.A. et al. Modern technologies of surgical treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis. Hirurgija pozvonochnika. 2008; 3. p. 40-47. (In Russ) (Продан А.И., Перепечай О.А., Колесниченко В.А. и др. Современные технологии хирургического лечения поясничного спинального стеноза. Хирургия позвоночника. 2008; 3. С. 40-47.)

Adogwa O., Carr K.R., Kudyba K. et al. Revision lumbar surgery in elderly patients with symptomatic pseudarthrosis, adjacent-segment disease, or same-level recurrent stenosis. Two-year outcomes and clinical efficacy J. Neurosurg Spine. 18: 139-146, 2013 139 ©AANS, 2013. doi: 10.3171/2012.11.spine12224.

Aleem I.S., Rampersaud Y.R. Elderly patients have similar outcomes compared to younger patients after minimally invasive surgery for spinal stenosis. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 2014. Jun; 472(6): 1824-30. doi: 10.1007/s11999-013-3411-y.

Anjarwalla N., Brown L., McGregor A. The outcome of spinal decompression surgery 5 years on. European Spine Journal. 2007; 16(11): 1842-1847. doi: 10.1007/s00586-007-0393-z.

Arinzon Z., Adunsky A., Fidelman Z., Gepstein R. Outcomes of decompression surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis in elderly diabetic patients. European Spine Journal February. 2004; Volume 13, Issue 1, pp. 32-37. doi: 10.1007/s00586-003-0643-7.

Arnoldi C.C., Brodsky A.E., Cauchoix J., et al. (1976) Lumbar spinal stenosis andnerve root entrapmentsyndromes. Definition andclassification. Clin Orthop Relat Res: 4-5

Boos N., Aebi M. Spinal Disorders. Fundamentals of Diagnosis and Treatment. Springer. 2008.

Cassinelli E., Eubanks J., Vogt M. et al. Risk Factors for the Development of Perioperative Complications in Elderly Patients Undergoing Lumbar Decompression and Arthrodesis for Spinal Stenosis. Spine. 2007; 32(2): 230-235. doi: 10.1097/01. brs.0000251918.19508.b3.

Сavuşoğlu H., Kaya R.A., Türkmenoglu O.N. et al. Midterm outcome after unilateral approach for bilateral decompression of lumbar spinal stenosis: 5-year prospective study. European Spine Journal. 2007; 16(12): 2133-2142. doi: 10.1007/s00586-007-0471-2.

Deyo R., Hickam D., Duckart J., Piedra M. Complications After Surgery for Lumbar Stenosis in a Veteran Population. Spine. 2013; 38(19): 1695-1702. doi: 10.1097/brs.0b013e31829f65c1.

Deyo R. Trends, Major Medical Complications, and Charges Associated With Surgery for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis in Older Adults. JAMA. 2010; 303(13): 1259. doi: 10.1001/jama.2010.338.

Forsth P., Michaelsson K., Sanden B. Does fusion improve the outcome after decompressive surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis?: A two-year follow-up study involving 5390 patients. The Bone & Joint Journal. 2013; 95-B(7): 960-965. doi: 10.1302/0301-620x.95b7.30776.

Foulongne E., Derrey S., Ould Slimane M. et al. Lumbar spinal stenosis: Which predictive factors of favorable functional results after decompressive laminectomy?. Neurochirurgie. 2013; 59(1): 23-29. doi: 10.1016/j.neuchi.2012.09.005.

Gelalis I., Stafilas K., Korompilias A., et al. Decompressive surgery for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: long-term results. International Orthopaedics (SICO. 2005; 30(1): 59-63. doi: 10.1007/s00264-005-0030-6.

Genevay S., Atlas S. Lumbar Spinal Stenosis. Best Practice & Research Clinical Rheumatology. 2010; 24(2): 253-265. doi: 10.1016/j.berh.2009.11.001.

Hara N., Oka H., Yamazaki T. et al. Predictors of residual symptoms in lower extremities after decompression surgery on lumbar spinal stenosis. European Spine Journal. 2010; 19(11): 1849-1854. doi: 10.1007/s00586-010-1374-1.

rlieJakola A., Smrlie A., Gulati S., et al. Clinical outcomes and safety assessment in elderly patients undergoing decompressive laminectomy for lumbar spinal stenosis: a prospective study. BMC Surgery. 2010; 10(1): 34. doi: 10.1186/1471-2482-10-34.

Jansson K., Nйmeth G., Granath F., Blomqvist P. Spinal stenosis re-operation rate in Sweden is 11% at 10 years-A national analysis of 9,664 operations. European Spine Journal. 2005; 14(7): 659-663. doi: 10.1007/s00586-004-0851-9.

Joaquim A., Sansur C., Hamilton D., Shaffrey C. Degenerative lumbar stenosis: update. Arq Neuro-Psiquiatr. 2009; 67(2b): 553-558. doi: 10.1590/s0004-282x2009000300039.

Kalff R., Ewald C., Waschke A., et al. Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Stenosis in Older People. Deutsches Arzteblatt Int. Sep. 2013; 110(37). P. 613-624.

Kirkaldy-Willis W., Wedge J., Yong-Hing K., Reilly J. Pathology and Pathogenesis of Lumbar Spondylosis and Stenosis. Spine. 1978; 3(4): 319-328. doi: 10.1097/00007632-197812000-00004.

Lee C., Hyun S., Kim K., et al. Decompression Only Versus Fusion Surgery for Lumbar Stenosis in Elderly Patients Over

Years Old: Which is Reasonable?. Neurologia medicochirurgica. 2013; 53(12): 870-874. doi: 10.2176/nmc.oa2012-0415.

Lee K., Teo E. Effects of laminectomy and facetectomy on the stability of the lumbar motion segment. Medical Engineering & Physics. 2004; 26(3): 183-192. doi: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2003.11.006.

Mamisch N., Brumann M., Hodler J. et al. Radiologic Criteria for the Diagnosis of Spinal Stenosis: Results of a Delphi Survey. Radiology. 2012; 264(1): 174-179. doi: 10.1148/radiol.12111930.

Mayer H., Heider F. Selektive, mikrochirurgische Cross-over“-Dekompression mehrsegmentaler lumbaler Spinalstenosen. Oper Orthop Traumatol. 2013; 25(1): 47-62. doi: 10.1007/s00064-012-0196-1.

McClendon J., Smith T., Thompson S. et al. The Impact of Body Mass Index on Hospital Stay and Complications After Spinal Fusion. Neurosurgery. 2014; 74(1): 42-50. doi: 10.1227/neu.0000000000000195.

Morgalla M., Noak N., Merkle M., Tatagiba M. Lumbar spinal stenosis in elderly patients: is a unilateral microsurgical approach sufficient for decompression?. Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine. 2011; 14(3): 305-312. doi: 10.3171/2010.10.spine09708.

Nanjo Y., Nagashima H., Dokai T. et al. Clinical features and surgical outcomes of lumbar spinal stenosis in patients aged 80 years or older: a multi-center retrospective study. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2013; 133(9): 1243-1248. doi: 10.1007/s00402-013-1808-4.

Pao J., Chen W., Chen P. Clinical outcomes of microendoscopic decompressive laminotomy for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis. European Spine Journal. 2009; 18(5): 672-678. doi: 10.1007/s00586-009-0903-2.

Schizas C., Theumann N., Burn A. et al. Qualitative Grading of Severity of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Based on the Morphology of the Dural Sac on Magnetic Resonance Images. Spine. 2010; 35(21): 1919-1924. doi: 10.1097/brs.0b013e3181d359bd.

Shabat S., Arinzon Z., Folman Y. et al. Long-term outcome of decompressive surgery for Lumbar spinal stenosis in octogenarians. European Spine Journal. 2007; 17(2): 193-198. doi: 10.1007/s00586-007-0514-8.

Shin S., Choi W., Hwang B. et al. Microscopic anterior foraminal decompression combined with anterior lumbar interbody fusion. The Spine Journal. 2013; 13(10): 1190-1199. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2013.07.458.

Slätis P., Malmivaara A., Heliövaara M. et al. Long-term results of surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis: a randomised controlled trial. European Spine Journal. 2011; 20(7): 1174-1181. doi: 10.1007/s00586-010-1652-y.

Son S., Kim W., Lee S., et al. A Comparison of the Clinical Outcomes of Decompression Alone and Fusion in Elderly Patients with Two-Level or More Lumbar Spinal Stenosis. J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2013; 53(1): 19. doi: 10.3340/ jkns.2013.53.1.19.

Steurer J., Roner S., Gnannt R., Hodler J. Quantitative radiologic criteria for the diagnosis of lumbar spinal stenosis: a systematic literature review. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. 2011; 12(1): 175. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-12-175.

Takaso M., Nakazawa T., Imura T. et al. Less invasive and less technically demanding decompressive procedure for lumbar spinal stenosis-appropriate for general orthopaedic surgeons?. International Orthopaedics (SICOT). 2010; 35(1): 67-73. doi: 10.1007/s00264-010-0986-8.

Verbiest H. The Significance and Principles of Computerized Axial Tomography in Idiopathic Developmental Stenosis of the Bony Lumbar Vertebral Canal. Spine. 1979; 4(4): 369-378. doi: 10.1097/00007632-197907000-00005.

Verbiest H. (1954) A radicular syndrome from developmental narrowing of the lumbar vertebral canal. J Bone Joint Surg Br 36-B: 230-7.

Wen-jian W., Yu L., Xin-kai Z. et al. Complications and clinical outcomes of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of one- or two-level degenerative disc diseases of the lumbar spine in patients older than 65 years. Chinese Medical Journal. 2012; 125(14). P. 2505-2510.

Zausinger S., Mehrkens J.H., Mдrz U., et al. Surgical treatment of lumbar spinal canal stenosis in elderly patients. MMW Fortschr Med. 2006 Oct 26; 148(43): 29-32.

Zeifang F., Schiltenwolf M., Abel R., Moradi B. Gait analysis does not correlate with clinical and MR imaging parameters in patients with symptomatic lumbar spinal stenosis. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. 2008; 9(1): 89. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-9-89.

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.